Logo image
Mixed Student Ideas about Mechanisms of Human Weight Loss
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Mixed Student Ideas about Mechanisms of Human Weight Loss

Kamali N. Sripathi, Rosa A. Moscarella, Rachel Yoho, Hye Sun You, Mark Urban-Lurain, John Merrill and Kevin Haudek
CBE life sciences education, Vol.18(3), pp.ar37-ar37
09/01/2019
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.18-11-0227
PMCID: PMC6755313
PMID: 31418653
url
https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.18-11-0227View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Recent calls for college biology education reform have identified "pathways and transformations of matter and energy" as a big idea in biology crucial for students to learn. Previous work has been conducted on how college students think about such matter-transforming processes; however, little research has investigated how students connect these ideas. Here, we probe student thinking about matter transformations in the familiar context of human weight loss. Our analysis of 1192 student constructed responses revealed three scientific (which we label "Normative") and five less scientific (Which we label "Developing") ideas that students use to explain weight loss. Additionally, students combine these ideas in their responses, with an average number of 2.19 +/- 1.07 ideas per response, and 74.4% of responses containing two or more ideas. These results highlight the extent to which students hold multiple (both correct and incorrect) ideas about complex biological processes. We described student responses as conforming to either Scientific, Mixed, or Developing descriptive models, which had an average of 1.9 +/- 0.6, 3.1 +/- 0.9, and 1.7 +/- 0.8 ideas per response, respectively. Such heterogeneous student thinking is characteristic of difficulties in both conceptual change and early expertise development and will require careful instructional intervention for lasting learning gains.
Education & Educational Research Education, Scientific Disciplines Social Sciences

Details

Metrics

Logo image