Logo image
Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Modeling Agricultural Watersheds with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): Calibration and Validation with a Novel Procedure for Spatially Explicit HRUs

Awoke Dagnew Teshager, Philip W Gassman, Silvia Secchi, Justin T Schoof and Girmaye Misgna
Environmental management (New York), Vol.57(4), pp.894-911
04/2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00267-015-0636-4
PMCID: PMC4785226
PMID: 26616430
url
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0636-4View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Applications of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model typically involve delineation of a watershed into subwatersheds/subbasins that are then further subdivided into hydrologic response units (HRUs) which are homogeneous areas of aggregated soil, landuse, and slope and are the smallest modeling units used within the model. In a given standard SWAT application, multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) in a subbasin are usually aggregated into a single HRU feature. In other words, the standard version of the model combines multiple potential HRUs (farm fields) with the same landuse/landcover, soil, and slope, but located at different places of a subbasin (spatially non-unique), and considers them as one HRU. In this study, ArcGIS pre-processing procedures were developed to spatially define a one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs (spatially unique HRUs) within a subbasin prior to SWAT simulations to facilitate input processing, input/output mapping, and further analysis at the individual farm field level. Model input data such as landuse/landcover (LULC), soil, crop rotation, and other management data were processed through these HRUs. The SWAT model was then calibrated/validated for Raccoon River watershed in Iowa for 2002-2010 and Big Creek River watershed in Illinois for 2000-2003. SWAT was able to replicate annual, monthly, and daily streamflow, as well as sediment, nitrate and mineral phosphorous within recommended accuracy in most cases. The one-to-one match between farm fields and HRUs created and used in this study is a first step in performing LULC change, climate change impact, and other analyses in a more spatially explicit manner.
Water Quality Hydrology Climate Change Agriculture Models, Theoretical Environmental Monitoring - methods Calibration Water Movements Iowa Illinois Rivers - chemistry Soil - chemistry Water - chemistry Nitrates - analysis Environmental Pollution - analysis

Details

Metrics

Logo image