Journal article
Nonhuman sequence learning findings argue against Hoerl and McCormack's two systems of temporal cognition
Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.42, pp.e248-20
2019
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X1900044X
PMID: 31826789
Abstract
Hoerl & McCormack propose that animals learn sequences through an entrainment-like process, rather than tracking the temporal addresses of each event in a given sequence. However, past research suggests that animals form “temporal maps” of sequential events and also comprehend the concept of ordinal position. These findings suggest that a clarification or qualification of the authors’ hypothesis is needed.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Nonhuman sequence learning findings argue against Hoerl and McCormack's two systems of temporal cognition
- Creators
- Benjamin J De Corte - aIowa Neuroscience Institute, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA52242benjamin-decorte@uiowa.eduhttps://scholar.google.com/citations?user=sfMWDHsAAAAJ&hl=enEdward A Wasserman - bDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA52242. ed-wasserman@uiowa.eduhttps://psychology.uiowa.edu/comparative-cognition-laboratory
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Vol.42, pp.e248-20
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press; New York, USA
- DOI
- 10.1017/S0140525X1900044X
- PMID
- 31826789
- ISSN
- 0140-525X
- eISSN
- 1469-1825
- Number of pages
- 2
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 2019
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences; Iowa Neuroscience Institute
- Record Identifier
- 9984070559502771
Metrics
23 Record Views