Logo image
Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE Guidelines)
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Nuclear Medicine and Artificial Intelligence: Best Practices for Evaluation (the RELAINCE Guidelines)

Abhinav K. Jha, Tyler J. Bradshaw, Irene Buvat, Mathieu Hatt, K. C. Prabhat, Chi Liu, Nancy F. Obuchowski, Babak Saboury, Piotr J. Slomka, John J. Sunderland, …
The Journal of nuclear medicine (1978), Vol.63(9), pp.1288-1299
09/01/2022
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.263239
PMCID: PMC9454473
PMID: 35618476
url
https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.121.263239View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

An important need exists for strategies to perform rigorous objective clini-cal-task-based evaluation of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms for nuclear medicine. To address this need, we propose a 4-class framework to evaluate AI algorithms for promise, technical task-specific efficacy, clinical decision making, and postdeployment efficacy. We provide best practices to evaluate AI algorithms for each of these classes. Each class of evaluation yields a claim that provides a descriptive performance of the AI algorithm. Key best practices are tabulated as the RELAINCE (Recommendations for EvaLuation of AI for NuClear medicinE) guide-lines. The report was prepared by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging AI Task Force Evaluation team, which consisted of nuclear-medicine physicians, physicists, computational imaging scien-tists, and representatives from industry and regulatory agencies.
Life Sciences & Biomedicine Radiology, Nuclear Medicine & Medical Imaging Science & Technology

Details

Logo image