Logo image
Back
Observed Differences in Patient Comorbidities and Complications Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Non-orthopaedic and Orthopaedic Referral Patients
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Observed Differences in Patient Comorbidities and Complications Undergoing Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty Between Non-orthopaedic and Orthopaedic Referral Patients

Bennett W Feuchtenberger, Michael C Marinier, Kyle Geiger, Matthew Van Engen, Natalie A Glass and Jacob Elkins
Curēus (Palo Alto, CA), Vol.16(4), e59258
04/2024
DOI: 10.7759/cureus.59258
PMCID: PMC11134475
PMID: 38813340
url
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.59258View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background: Value-based total joint arthroplasty (TJA) has resulted in decreasing surgeon reimbursement which has created concern that surgeons are being incentivized to avoid medically complex patients. The purpose of this study was to determine if patients who underwent primary total knee (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA) had different comorbidities and complication rates based on referral type: 1) non-orthopaedic referral (NOR), 2) outside orthopaedic referral (OOR) or 3) self-referral (SR). Methods: At a single tertiary care centre, patients undergoing primary TJA between July 2019 and January 2020 were identified using current procedural codes. Data were abstracted from the Institutional National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) along with electronic medical records which included referral type, primary insurance, demographics, comorbidities, and comorbidity scores, including an American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score. Complications and outcomes were tracked for 90 days post-operatively. Referral groups were compared using Chi -square exact tests for categorical variables and t-tests or Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests for continuous variables, as appropriate. Results: Of the 393 patients included in this study, there were 249 (63%) NOR, 104 (26%) OOR, and 40 (10%) SR. The OOR versus NOR group had a significantly greater proportion of patients with obesity (79 vs 64%, p=0.047) and an ASA score ≥3 (59 vs 43%, p=0.007). There was a significantly greater proportion of patients with wound complications (10 vs 4%, p=0.023) and ≥2 complications (14 vs 3%, p<0.001) in OOR versus NOR, respectively. Conclusion: Patients who underwent primary TJA and were referred by an orthopaedic surgeon tended to have more comorbid conditions and higher rates of severe complications. The observed difference in referrals may be explained by monetary incentivization in the context of current reimbursement trends. Organizations utilizing bundled payment programs to reimburse surgeons should use a risk-stratification model to mitigate incentivizing surgeons to avoid medically complex patients.
 Orthopedics

Details

Metrics

22 Record Views
Logo image