Logo image
On Becoming a Peer Reviewer for a Neuropsychology Journal
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

On Becoming a Peer Reviewer for a Neuropsychology Journal

Kevin Duff, Sid E O'Bryant, Holly James Westervelt, Jerry J Sweet, Cecil R Reynolds, Wilfred G van Gorp, Daniel Tranel and Robert J McCaffrey
Archives of clinical neuropsychology, Vol.24(3), pp.201-207
05/2009
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acp031
PMID: 19640873
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acp031View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.
Professional issues Test construction Statistical methods

Details

Metrics

Logo image