Journal article
On the proper domain of psychological predicates
Synthese (Dordrecht), Vol.194(11), pp.4289-4310
11/2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-014-0603-2
Abstract
One question of the bounds of cognition is that of which things have it. A scientifically relevant debate on this question must explain the persistent and selective use of psychological predicates to report findings throughout biology: for example, that neurons prefer, plants and fruit flies decide, and bacteria communicate linguistically. This paper argues that these claims should enjoy default literal interpretation, and that these reports of psychological properties in non-humans are as straightforward as they seem. An epistemic consequence is that these findings can contribute directly to understanding the nature of psychological capacities.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- On the proper domain of psychological predicates
- Creators
- Carrie Figdor
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Synthese (Dordrecht), Vol.194(11), pp.4289-4310
- DOI
- 10.1007/s11229-014-0603-2
- ISSN
- 0039-7857
- eISSN
- 1573-0964
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 11/2017
- Academic Unit
- Iowa Neuroscience Institute; Philosophy
- Record Identifier
- 9984002598802771
Metrics
33 Record Views