Logo image
One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

One-year eye-to-eye comparison of wavefront-guided versus wavefront-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis in hyperopes

Christopher S Sáles and Edward E Manche
Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), Vol.8, pp.2229-2238
2014
DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S70145
PMCID: PMC4235493
PMID: 25419115
url
https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S70145View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To compare wavefront (WF)-guided and WF-optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in hyperopes with respect to the parameters of safety, efficacy, predictability, refractive error, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and higher order aberrations. Twenty-two eyes of eleven participants with hyperopia with or without astigmatism were prospectively randomized to receive WF-guided LASIK with the VISX CustomVue S4 IR or WF-optimized LASIK with the WaveLight Allegretto Eye-Q 400 Hz. LASIK flaps were created using the 150-kHz IntraLase iFS. Evaluations included measurement of uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, <5% and <25% contrast sensitivity, and WF aberrometry. Patients also completed a questionnaire detailing symptoms on a quantitative grading scale. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for any of the variables studied after 12 months of follow-up (all P>0.05). This comparative case series of 11 subjects with hyperopia showed that WF-guided and WF-optimized LASIK had similar clinical outcomes at 12 months.
LASIK wavefront hyperopic

Details

Metrics

Logo image