Logo image
Operative versus nonoperative treatment of stress-positive lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries: A multicenter retrospective propensity-matched analysis
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Operative versus nonoperative treatment of stress-positive lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring injuries: A multicenter retrospective propensity-matched analysis

Lucas S. Marchand, Justin Haller, Lillia Steffenson, Tyler Thorne, Ellie Sato, Stephen J Shymon, Daniel S Choi, Michael T Kody, Graham J DeKeyser, Zachary M Working, …
Journal of orthopaedic trauma, Vol.40(3), pp.113-118
03/2026
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000003108
PMID: 41182893

View Online

Abstract

Objectives: To compare outcomes of operative versus nonoperative management of stress-positive lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries. Methods: Design: Multicenter retrospective study Setting: Eight level 1 trauma centers. Patients Selection Criteria: Patients with minimally displaced stress-positive LC1 pelvic ring injuries (OTA/AO 61B2) treated with acute operative (≤3 days) versus nonoperative management. Outcome Measures and Comparisons: Propensity-matching was used to compare operative versus nonoperative groups in terms of hospital length of stay (LOS), maximum feet ambulated while hospitalized, discharge to home versus a facility, unassisted ambulation at last follow-up, and mortality. Results: There were 224 patients included: 139 operative and 85 nonoperative. Operative versus nonoperative patients were similar in terms of age (47.0 vs. 59.0, p=0.06), female gender (61.2% vs. 68.2%, p=0.32), and follow-up duration (159 vs. 122 days, p=0.05), and were more likely to have complete sacral fractures (63.3% vs. 35.3%; p=<0.0001), and less likely to be injured in ground-level falls (17.3% vs. 32.9%; p=0.007) and to have baseline assisted ambulation (5.8%% vs. 16.4%; p=0.008). After matching for these differences, operative versus nonoperative patients (77 vs. 77) had a lower mortality rate (5.2% vs. 15.6%, p=0.04), and were similar in terms of follow-up duration (134 vs 122 days, p=0.39), max feet ambulated while hospitalized (16.5 vs. 50.0 feet, p=0.55), hospital length of stay (5.0 vs. 5.0 days, p=0.39), discharging to home (68.8% vs 71.4%, p=0.72), and unassisted ambulation at last follow-up (76.6% vs. 62.3%, p=0.05). Mortality was associated with older age (72 vs. 48 years, p=0.0002), a higher CCI (3.0 vs. 1.0, p=0.003), assisted ambulation at baseline (29.4% vs. 8.2%, p=0.02), and ground-level falls (64.7% vs. 19.8%, p=0.0002). Conclusion: On matched analysis, operative versus nonoperative management was associated with a lower mortality rate. Mortality was associated with fragility fracture characteristics suggesting that this is an at-risk population. Level of Evidence: Diagnostic Level III.
lateral compression type 1 pelvic ring operative nonoperative stress positive stress radiograph examination under anesthesia sacral fracture fragility pelvic fracture

Details

Metrics

9 Record Views
Logo image