Logo image
Outcome indicators for direct and indirect caregiving
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Outcome indicators for direct and indirect caregiving

Deborah Perry Schoenfelder, Elizabeth A. Swanson, Janet K. Pringle Specht, Meridean Maas and Marion Johnson
Clinical nursing research, Vol.9(1), pp.47-69
02/01/2000
DOI: 10.1177/10547730022158438
PMID: 11271047

View Online

Abstract

Informal caregiving and outcomes for caregiving are an important part of health care and of particular importance in nursing. The purpose of this research is to report the results of a survey mailed to nursing experts for validation of the outcome labels Caregiver Role Performance: Direct Care and Caregiver Role Performance: Indirect Care and their accompanying indicators. Experts were asked to rate how important the identified indicators were for assessing those two outcomes. In addition, the respondents were asked to what extent nursing interventions influence the achievement of each identified indicator for Caregiver Role Performance: Direct Care and Caregiver Role Performance: Indirect Care. In general, the validity of the concept analysis work by the caregiver focus group was supported. Ten indicators for Caregiver Performance: Direct Care were retained, 1 was dropped that was considered most appropriate for indirect care, and 3 new indicators were added to reflect the nurse experts surveyed. For Caregiver Performance: Indirect Care, all of the indicators were retained.

Nursing Caregivers/standards Data Collection Family Nursing/standards Humans Outcome Assessment (Health Care) Professional-Family Relations Social Support

Details

Metrics

49 Record Views
Logo image