Outcomes Measures in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

Elena Sagues; Andres Gudino; Carlos Dier; Connor Aamot; Edgar A Samaniego

doi:10.1007/s12975-024-01284-3

Despite advancements in acute management, morbidity rates for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remain high. Therefore, it is imperative to utilize standardized outcome scales in SAH research for evaluating new therapies effectively. This review offers a comprehensive overview of prevalent scales and clinical outcomes used in SAH assessment, accompanied by recommendations for their application and prognostic accuracy. Standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria should be employed when reporting pathophysiological outcomes such as symptomatic vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Furthermore, integrating clinical severity scales like the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale and modified Fisher score into clinical trials is advised to evaluate their prognostic significance, despite their limited correlation with outcomes. The modified Rankin score is widely used for assessing functional outcomes, while the Glasgow outcome scale-extended version is suitable for broader social and behavioral evaluations. Avoiding score dichotomization is crucial to retain valuable information. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes, though frequently affected in patients with favorable neurological outcomes, are often overlooked during follow-up outpatient visits, despite their significant impact on quality of life. Comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations conducted by trained professionals are recommended for characterizing cognitive function, with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment serving as a viable screening tool. Additionally, integrating psychological inventories like the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory, along with quality-of-life scales such as the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, can effectively assess behavioral and quality of life outcomes in SAH studies.Despite advancements in acute management, morbidity rates for subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) remain high. Therefore, it is imperative to utilize standardized outcome scales in SAH research for evaluating new therapies effectively. This review offers a comprehensive overview of prevalent scales and clinical outcomes used in SAH assessment, accompanied by recommendations for their application and prognostic accuracy. Standardized terminology and diagnostic criteria should be employed when reporting pathophysiological outcomes such as symptomatic vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Furthermore, integrating clinical severity scales like the World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies scale and modified Fisher score into clinical trials is advised to evaluate their prognostic significance, despite their limited correlation with outcomes. The modified Rankin score is widely used for assessing functional outcomes, while the Glasgow outcome scale-extended version is suitable for broader social and behavioral evaluations. Avoiding score dichotomization is crucial to retain valuable information. Cognitive and behavioral outcomes, though frequently affected in patients with favorable neurological outcomes, are often overlooked during follow-up outpatient visits, despite their significant impact on quality of life. Comprehensive neuropsychological evaluations conducted by trained professionals are recommended for characterizing cognitive function, with the Montreal Cognitive Assessment serving as a viable screening tool. Additionally, integrating psychological inventories like the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventory, along with quality-of-life scales such as the Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale, can effectively assess behavioral and quality of life outcomes in SAH studies.

Outcomes Measures in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research

View Online

Abstract

Details

Metrics