Journal article
Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Improves Survival in Patients Who Progress After Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
Annals of surgical oncology, Vol.32(2), pp.1136-1148
02/2025
DOI: 10.1245/s10434-024-16463-7
PMCID: PMC12828487
PMID: 39505730
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We investigated a 2-decade experience with PRRT to determine whether PRRT confers a survival advantage to patients who progress after surgery versus other therapies.BACKGROUNDPeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an effective treatment for advanced gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). We investigated a 2-decade experience with PRRT to determine whether PRRT confers a survival advantage to patients who progress after surgery versus other therapies.We identified patients from our clinic who had resection/cytoreduction of GEP-NETs, then disease progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), calculated from progression after surgery (no-PRRT group) or the start of PRRT. Cox regression with time-dependent covariates controlled for immortal time bias and other confounders.METHODSWe identified patients from our clinic who had resection/cytoreduction of GEP-NETs, then disease progression by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1. The Kaplan-Meier method assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), calculated from progression after surgery (no-PRRT group) or the start of PRRT. Cox regression with time-dependent covariates controlled for immortal time bias and other confounders.Overall, 237 patients progressed after surgery; 95 received PRRT and 142 did not. No differences existed in sex, T or N stage, tumor grade/differentiation, primary site, or time to progression; 94% of PRRT patients had metastases at diagnosis versus 77% in the no-PRRT group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group versus the no-PRRT group (32.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001), as was median OS (49.8 vs. 38.4 months; p = 0.009). In subgroup analysis, the PRRT group had improved PFS in small bowel NETs and pancreatic NETs. Time-dependent covariate analysis revealed a lower risk of death associated with PRRT (hazard ratio 0.61, p = 0.028) after adjusting for sex, age, M stage, tumor grade, and primary site.RESULTSOverall, 237 patients progressed after surgery; 95 received PRRT and 142 did not. No differences existed in sex, T or N stage, tumor grade/differentiation, primary site, or time to progression; 94% of PRRT patients had metastases at diagnosis versus 77% in the no-PRRT group. Median PFS was longer in the PRRT group versus the no-PRRT group (32.4 vs. 11.0 months, p < 0.001), as was median OS (49.8 vs. 38.4 months; p = 0.009). In subgroup analysis, the PRRT group had improved PFS in small bowel NETs and pancreatic NETs. Time-dependent covariate analysis revealed a lower risk of death associated with PRRT (hazard ratio 0.61, p = 0.028) after adjusting for sex, age, M stage, tumor grade, and primary site.Surgical resection and cytoreduction is an effective treatment for patients with GEP-NETs, but most patients with metastatic disease develop recurrent disease. Surgery followed by PRRT after progression conferred superior PFS and OS over no PRRT/other therapies, and is an effective strategy for managing patients with GEP-NETs.CONCLUSIONSurgical resection and cytoreduction is an effective treatment for patients with GEP-NETs, but most patients with metastatic disease develop recurrent disease. Surgery followed by PRRT after progression conferred superior PFS and OS over no PRRT/other therapies, and is an effective strategy for managing patients with GEP-NETs.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy Improves Survival in Patients Who Progress After Resection of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors
- Creators
- Luis C Borbon - University of IowaScott K Sherman - University of IowaPatrick J Breheny - University of IowaChandrikha Chandrasekharan - University of IowaYusuf Menda - University of IowaDavid Bushnell - University of IowaAndrew M Bellizzi - University of IowaP H Ear - University of IowaM Sue O'DorisioThomas M O'DorisioJoseph S Dillon - University of IowaJames R Howe - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Annals of surgical oncology, Vol.32(2), pp.1136-1148
- DOI
- 10.1245/s10434-024-16463-7
- PMID
- 39505730
- PMCID
- PMC12828487
- NLM abbreviation
- Ann Surg Oncol
- ISSN
- 1534-4681
- eISSN
- 1534-4681
- Publisher
- SPRINGER
- Grant note
- NIH
This study was supported by NIH grants P50 CA174521-01 (Iowa SPORE Grant) and T32 CA148062-01 (Surgical Oncology Training Grant).
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 11/06/2024
- Date published
- 02/2025
- Academic Unit
- Radiology; Hematology, Oncology, and Blood & Marrow Transplantation; Stead Family Department of Pediatrics; Pathology; Biostatistics; Surgery; Radiation Oncology; Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center; Endocrinology and Metabolism; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984742655702771
Metrics
38 Record Views