Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks

Kathryn R. Dalton; William Altekruse; Peter Campbell; Kathy Ruble; Karen C. Carroll; Roland J Thorpe Jr; Jacqueline Agnew; Meghan F. Davis

doi:10.62845/YC5qPCM

Back

Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks

Kathryn R. Dalton, William Altekruse, Peter Campbell, Kathy Ruble, Karen C. Carroll, Roland J Thorpe Jr, Jacqueline Agnew and Meghan F. Davis

People and animals (West Lafayette, IN), Vol.5(1), 4

01/01/2022

DOI: 10.62845/YC5qPCM

PMCID: PMC9235541

PMID: 35765567

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.62845/YC5qPCMView

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background: Animal-assisted intervention (AAI) programs, used widely for patient benefit, have increasingly been used for healthcare workers (HCW) to reduce occupational stress. However, there are barriers to these programs which limit their utilization, for both patients and HCW, specifically infectious disease concerns. The aim of the research project is to identify barriers and facilitators to AAI program use for healthcare worker benefit, and determine knowledge, beliefs, and practices regarding infectious disease risk and control policies, in order to understand the contextual parameters of program implementation. Methods: We collected perceptions of key stakeholders involved with hospital AAI programs (HCW and AAI workers) through semi-structured in-depth interviews. We used framework analysis to guide thematic coding, completed independently by three researchers. Results: We interviewed 37 participants in this study. We divided our themes into two topic areas: program use for HCW and perceived infectious disease risk. Use for healthcare workers included perspectives on the benefits for HCW and program barriers and facilitators (specifically collaboration and leadership). Perceived risk included opinions on infection concerns with AAI, thoughts on control measures to reduce this risk, and responsibility for safety during these programs. Conclusions: While significant benefits were reported for HCW, they were limited by administrative barriers and hazard concerns. Facilitators to surmount these barriers are best implemented with collaboration across the hospital and appropriate leadership roles to direct safe program implementation. By addressing these barriers through targeted facilitators in the form of evidence-backed guidelines, AAI programs can be used to benefit both patients and HCW.

Details

Title: Subtitle: Perceptions and Practices of Key Worker Stakeholder Groups in Hospital Animal-Assisted Intervention Programs on Occupational Benefits and Perceived Risks
Creators: Kathryn R. Dalton - Johns Hopkins University
William Altekruse - University of Maryland, Baltimore
Peter Campbell - University of Maryland, Baltimore
Kathy Ruble - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Karen C. Carroll - Johns Hopkins Medicine
Roland J Thorpe Jr - Johns Hopkins University
Jacqueline Agnew - Johns Hopkins University
Meghan F. Davis - Johns Hopkins University
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: People and animals (West Lafayette, IN), Vol.5(1), 4
DOI: 10.62845/YC5qPCM
PMID: 35765567
PMCID: PMC9235541
ISSN: 2575-9078
eISSN: 2575-9078
Language: English
Date published: 01/01/2022
Academic Unit: Occupational and Environmental Health
Record Identifier: 9984702725002771

Metrics

3 Record Views