Journal article
Performance After Cochlear Reimplantation Using a Different Manufacturer
Otology & neurotology, Vol.45(9), pp.1016-1022
10/2024
DOI: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004314
PMID: 39264919
Abstract
Objective To better understand cochlear implant (CI) performance after reimplantation with a different device manufacturer. Study Design Multisite retrospective review. Setting Tertiary referral centers. Patients Patients older than 4 years who received a CI and subsequently underwent CI reimplantation with a different manufacturer over a 20-year period Intervention Reimplantation. Main Outcome Measure The primary outcome was difference in the best CNC score obtained with the primary CI, compared with the most recent CNC score obtained after reimplantation. Results Twenty-nine patients met the criteria at three centers. The best average CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation was 46.2% (n = 16), measured an average of 14 months (range: 3–36 mo) postoperatively. When looking at the most recent CNC score of adult patients before undergoing reimplantation, the average CNC score dropped to 19.2% (n = 17). After reimplantation, the average 3- to 6-month CNC score was 48.3% (n = 12), with most recent average CNC score being 44.4% (n = 17) measured an average of 19 months (range: 3–46 mo) postoperatively. There was no statistically significant difference ( p = 0.321; t 11 = 0.48) identified in performance between the best CNC score achieved by adult patients after primary cochlear implantation, and the most recent score achieved after reimplantation (n = 12). Analysis of prerevision and postrevision speech performance was not possible in pediatric patients (<18 yr old) because of differences in tests administered. Conclusion Patients undergoing reimplantation with a different manufacturer achieved CNC score performance comparable to their best performance with their original device.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Performance After Cochlear Reimplantation Using a Different Manufacturer
- Creators
- Justin Cottrell - NYU Langone HealthEmily Spitzer - NYU Langone HealthArianna Winchester - NYU Langone HealthCamille Dunn-Johnson - University of IowaBruce Gantz - University of IowaSusan Rathgeb - Washington University in St. LouisMatthew Shew - Washington University in St. LouisJacques Herzog - Washington University in St. LouisCraig Buchman - Washington University in St. LouisDavid Friedmann - NYU Langone HealthDaniel Jethanamest - NYU Langone HealthSean McMenomey - NYU Langone HealthSusan Waltzman - NYU Langone HealthJ Thomas Roland - NYU Langone Health
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Otology & neurotology, Vol.45(9), pp.1016-1022
- Publisher
- LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
- DOI
- 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004314
- PMID
- 39264919
- ISSN
- 1531-7129
- eISSN
- 1537-4505
- Number of pages
- 7
- Grant note
We would like to thank the audiologists who administered the tests for this project.
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 10/2024
- Academic Unit
- Communication Sciences and Disorders; Iowa Neuroscience Institute; Neurosurgery; Otolaryngology
- Record Identifier
- 9984708762702771
Metrics
3 Record Views