Logo image
Performance of the MRI-Based Virtual Bone Biopsy in the Distal Radius: Serial Reproducibility and Reliability of Structural and Mechanical Parameters in Women Representative of Osteoporosis Study Populations
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Performance of the MRI-Based Virtual Bone Biopsy in the Distal Radius: Serial Reproducibility and Reliability of Structural and Mechanical Parameters in Women Representative of Osteoporosis Study Populations

Shing Chun Benny Lam, Michael J Wald, Chamith S Rajapakse, Yinxiao Liu, Punam K Saha and Felix W Wehrli
Bone (New York, N.Y.), Vol.49(4), pp.895-903
10/2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2011.07.010
PMCID: PMC3167016
PMID: 21784189
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3167016View
Open Access

Abstract

Serial reproducibility and reliability critically determine sensitivity to detect changes in response to intervention and provide a basis for sample size estimates. Here, we evaluated the performance of the MRI-based Virtual Bone Biopsy in terms of 26 structural and mechanical parameters in the distal radius of 20 women in the age range of 50 to 75 years (mean = 62.0 years, S.D. = 8.1 years), representative of typical study populations in drug intervention trials and fracture studies. Subjects were examined three times at average intervals of 20.2 days (S.D. = 14.5 days) by MRI at 1.5 T field strength at a voxel size of 137×137×410 μm 3 . Methods involved prospective and retrospective 3D image registration and auto-focus motion correction. Analyses were performed from a central 5×5×5 mm 3 cuboid subvolume and trabecular volume consisting of a 13 mm axial slab encompassing the entire medullary cavity. Whole-volume axial stiffness and sub-regional Young’s and shear moduli were computed by finite-element analysis. Whole-volume-derived aggregate mean coefficient of variation of all structural parameters was 4.4% (range 1.8% to 7.7%) and 4.0% for axial stiffness; corresponding data in the subvolume were 6.5% (range 1.6% to 13.0%) for structural, and 5.5% (range 4.6% to 6.5%) for mechanical parameters. Aggregate ICC was 0.976 (range 0.947 to 0.986) and 0.992 for whole-volume-derived structural parameters and axial stiffness, and 0.946 (range 0.752 to 0.991) and 0.974 (range 0.965 to 0.978) for subvolume-derived structural and mechanical parameters, respectively. The strongest predictors of whole-volume axial stiffness were BV/TV, junction density, skeleton density and Tb.N (R 2 0.79 – 0.87). The same parameters were also highly predictive of sub-regional axial modulus (R 2 0.88 – 0.91). The data suggest that the method is suited for longitudinal assessment of the response to therapy. The underlying technology is portable and should be compatible with all general-purpose MRI scanners, which is appealing considering the very large installed base of this modality.
Mechanics Osteoporosis trabecular bone virtual bone biopsy reproducibility structure

Details

Metrics

Logo image