Journal article
Pilot Study to Determine Optimal Stent Duration Following Ureteroscopy: Three versus Seven days
Current urology, Vol.11(2), pp.97-102
02/2018
DOI: 10.1159/000447201
PMCID: PMC5836241
PMID: 29593469
Abstract
Background/aims: Many providers elect to place a stent following ureteroscopy for nephrolithiasis, but little data exists on the optimal duration to leave a stent. We sought to determine whether there are any differences in post-operative outcomes for patients with a 3 versus 7-day stent following ureteroscopy.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 247 patients who underwent unilateral ureteroscopy with lithotripsy, 79 of whom removed a stent with an extraction string at 3 or 7 days post-operatively. These 2 groups were compared with regard to demographic information, pre-operative variables, and post-operative outcomes.
Results: Of all patients, 33% experienced a post-procedure related event (phone call, extra clinic visit, and emergency department visit) within 30 days of their procedure, 39% of 3-day stent patients compared to 21% of 7-day patients (p = 0.11). Within the 3 days following stent removal, 3-day stent patients were significantly more likely to have a post-procedure related event than 7-day patients (23 vs. 3%, p = 0.026).
Conclusion: One third of patients with a post-operative ureteral stent will seek medical care in the 30 days following ureteroscopy. Leaving a stent for 3 versus 7 days may lead to worse outcomes with regard to post-operative events and fank pain.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Pilot Study to Determine Optimal Stent Duration Following Ureteroscopy: Three versus Seven days
- Creators
- Charles J Paul - Department of Urology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USANathan A Brooks - Department of Urology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USAGeorge M Ghareeb - Department of Urology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USAChad R Tracy - Department of Urology, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Current urology, Vol.11(2), pp.97-102
- DOI
- 10.1159/000447201
- PMID
- 29593469
- PMCID
- PMC5836241
- NLM abbreviation
- Curr Urol
- ISSN
- 1661-7649
- eISSN
- 1661-7657
- Publisher
- S. Karger AG
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 02/2018
- Academic Unit
- Radiology; Urology
- Record Identifier
- 9984051507902771
Metrics
17 Record Views