Journal article
Pollster problems in the 2016 US presidential election: vote intention, vote prediction
Quaderni dell'Osservatorio elettorale. QOE - IJES, Vol.83(1), pp.17-28
07/28/2020
DOI: 10.36253/qoe-9529
Abstract
In recent US presidential elections, there has been considerable focus on how well public opinion can forecast the outcome, and 2016 proved no exception. Pollsters and poll aggregators regularly offered numbers on the horse-race, usually pointing to a Clinton victory, which failed to occur. We argue that these polling assessments of support were misleading for at least two reasons. First, Trump voters were sorely underestimated, especially at the state level of polling. Second, and more broadly, we suggest that excessive reliance on non-probability sampling was at work. Here we present evidence to support our contention, ending with a plea for consideration of other methods of election forecasting that are not based on vote intention polls.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Pollster problems in the 2016 US presidential election: vote intention, vote prediction
- Creators
- Natalie JacksonMichael S Lewis-BeckCharles Tien
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Quaderni dell'Osservatorio elettorale. QOE - IJES, Vol.83(1), pp.17-28
- DOI
- 10.36253/qoe-9529
- ISSN
- 0392-6753
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 07/28/2020
- Academic Unit
- Political Science
- Record Identifier
- 9984025662602771
Metrics
21 Record Views