Ponseti method in patients with myelomeningocele a fifty-patient-series matched with idiopathic cases

Elizabeth de Alvarenga Borges da Fonseca; Pothyra Campos Pascoal; Jose Antonio Morcuende; Monica Paschoal Nogueira

doi:10.1186/s12887-026-07667-9

Back

Ponseti method in patients with myelomeningocele a fifty-patient-series matched with idiopathic cases

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Ponseti method in patients with myelomeningocele a fifty-patient-series matched with idiopathic cases

Elizabeth de Alvarenga Borges da Fonseca, Pothyra Campos Pascoal, Jose Antonio Morcuende and Monica Paschoal Nogueira

BMC pediatrics

09/17/2026

DOI: 10.1186/s12887-026-07667-9

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07667-9View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background Clubfoot is present in approximately 30–50% in patients with meningomyelocele, and its treatment aims to minimize the impact on mobility and quality of life of these children. Treatment options still include multiple surgical procedures. However, the indications for the Ponseti method expanded in the early 2000s with its use for myelodysplastic feet. The hypothesis of this study is that the Ponseti method in patients with meningomyelocele and Clubfoot has similar results to patients with idiopathic clubfoot. Methods This is a retrospective observational cohort study from 2004 to 2024 comparing a group of patients with Clubfoot and meningomyelocele who underwent treatment using the Ponseti method with patients with idiopathic Clubfoot who underwent correction using this method. The first with 50 patients (83 feet) with Clubfoot and meningomyelocele and the second with 170 patients with idiopathic Clubfoot (293 feet). Results Initial correction was achieved in 96% of myelomeningocele patients, and 82% maintained correction at final follow-up. No significant differences were found between groups regarding initial Pirani score, final Pirani score, number of casts, or recurrence rate. Complications were significantly more frequent in myelomeningocele patients (44% vs. 8%). Subgroup analysis showed no significant differences between high and low lumbar levels in number of casts, complications, or need for tenotomy. Conclusion Regarding subgroup analysis, high and low lumbar meningomyelocele, the initial Pirani score, and bilaterality presented statistically significant differences.

Details

Title: Subtitle: Ponseti method in patients with myelomeningocele a fifty-patient-series matched with idiopathic cases
Creators: Elizabeth de Alvarenga Borges da Fonseca - Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual
Pothyra Campos Pascoal - Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual
Jose Antonio Morcuende - University of Iowa
Monica Paschoal Nogueira - Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Público Estadual
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: BMC pediatrics
DOI: 10.1186/s12887-026-07667-9
ISSN: 1471-2431
eISSN: 1471-2431
Publisher: Springer Nature
Language: English
Electronic publication date: 09/17/2026
Academic Unit: Stead Family Department of Pediatrics; Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
Record Identifier: 9985236418702771

Metrics

1 Record Views