Journal article
Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study
Gynecologic Oncology, Vol.148(1), pp.49-55
01/2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.011
PMCID: PMC5962447
PMID: 29174555
Abstract
Microscopic residual disease following complete cytoreduction (R0) is associated with a significant survival benefit for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Our objective was to develop a prediction model for R0 to support surgeons in their clinical care decisions. Demographic, pathologic, surgical, and CA125 data were collected from GOG 182 records. Patients enrolled prior to September 1, 2003 were used for the training model while those enrolled after constituted the validation data set. Univariate analysis was performed to identify significant predictors of R0 and these variables were subsequently analyzed using multivariable regression. The regression model was reduced using backward selection and predictive accuracy was quantified using area under the receiver operating characteristic area under the curve (AUC) in both the training and the validation data sets. Of the 3882 patients enrolled in GOG 182, 1480 had complete clinical data available for the analysis. The training data set consisted of 1007 patients (234 with R0) while the validation set was comprised of 473 patients (122 with R0). The reduced multivariable regression model demonstrated several variables predictive of R0 at cytoreduction: Disease Score (DS) (p<0.001), stage (p=0.009), CA125 (p<0.001), ascites (p<0.001), and stage-age interaction (p=0.01). Applying the prediction model to the validation data resulted in an AUC of 0.73 (0.67 to 0.78, 95% CI). Inclusion of DS enhanced the model performance to an AUC of 0.83 (0.79 to 0.88, 95% CI). We developed and validated a prediction model for R0 that offers improved performance over previously reported models for prediction of residual disease. The performance of the prediction model suggests additional factors (i.e. imaging, molecular profiling, etc.) should be explored in the future for a more clinically actionable tool. •A predictive model for R0 was developed and validated.•Variables included disease score, stage, CA125, ascites, and stage-age interaction.•Model alone should not determine management of advanced stage ovarian cancer.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Predictive modeling for determination of microscopic residual disease at primary cytoreduction: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group 182 Study
- Creators
- Neil S Horowitz - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, United StatesG Larry MaxwellAustin Miller - NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United StatesChad A Hamilton - Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center and Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD 20889, United StatesBunja Rungruang - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Medical College of Georgia of Augusta University, Augusta, GA 30912, United StatesNoah Rodriguez - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Irvine Medical Center, Irvine, CA 92868, United StatesScott D Richard - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA 19102, United StatesThomas C Krivak - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, United StatesJeffrey M Fowler - Dept. of Gynecologic Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United StatesDavid G Mutch - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO 63110, United StatesLinda Van Le - Department of OB/GYN, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, United StatesRoger B Lee - Department of GYN/ONC, Tacoma General Hospital, Tacoma, WA 98405, United StatesPeter Argenta - Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, United StatesDavid Bender - Gyn/Onc Division, University of Iowa, Iowa, IA 52242, United StatesKrishnansu S Tewari - Department of Gynecologic Oncology, University of California at Irvine, Orange, CA 92868, United StatesDavid Gershenson - Department of GYN/ONC, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77230, United StatesJames J Java - NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group, Statistical and Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United StatesMichael A Bookman - US Oncology Research and Arizona Oncology, Tucson, AZ 85711, United States
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Gynecologic Oncology, Vol.148(1), pp.49-55
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.10.011
- PMID
- 29174555
- PMCID
- PMC5962447
- NLM abbreviation
- Gynecol Oncol
- ISSN
- 0090-8258
- eISSN
- 1095-6859
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc
- Grant note
- CA 27469; CA 37517; 1U10 CA180822; U10CA180868 / National Cancer Institute (http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000054)
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/2018
- Academic Unit
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Record Identifier
- 9983930274002771
Metrics
37 Record Views