Logo image
Back
Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Radiologists’ Performance at Reduced Recall Rates in Mammography: A Laboratory Study

Norhashimah Mohd Norsuddin, Claudia Mello-Thoms, Warren Reed and Sarah Lewis
Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, Vol.20(2), pp.537-543
02/26/2019
DOI: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.537
PMCID: PMC6897043
PMID: 30803217
url
https://doi.org/10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.2.537View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: Target recall rates are often used as a performance indicator in mammography screening programs with the intention of reducing false positive decisions, over diagnosis and anxiety for participants. However, the relationship between target recall rates and cancer detection is unclear, especially when readers are directed to adhere to a predetermined rate. The purpose of this study was to explore the effect of setting different recall rates on radiologist’s performance. Materials and Methods: Institutional ethics approval was granted and informed consent was obtained from each participating radiologist. Five experienced breast imaging radiologists read a single test set of 200 mammographic cases (20 abnormal and 180 normal). The radiologists were asked to identify each case that they required to be recalled in three different recall conditions; free recall, 15% and 10% and mark the location of any suspicious lesions. Results: Wide variability in recall rates was observed when reading at free recall, ranging from 18.5% to 34.0%. Readers demonstrated significantly reduced performance when reading at prescribed recall rates, with lower sensitivity (H=12.891, P=0.002), case location sensitivity (H=12.512, P=0.002) and ROC AUC (H=11.601, P=0.003) albeit with an increased specificity (H=12.704, P=0.002). However, no significant changes were evident in lesion location sensitivity (H=1.982, P=0.371) and JAFROC FOM (H=1.820, P=0.403). Conclusion: In this laboratory study, reducing the number of recalled cases to 10% significantly reduced radiologists’ performance with lower detection sensitivity, although a significant improvement in specificity was observed.
 Breast - diagnostic imaging Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Clinical Competence Diagnostic Errors - prevention & control Early Detection of Cancer - standards Female Humans Mammography - standards Observer Variation Radiographic Image Enhancement - standards Radiologists - standards Sensitivity and Specificity Task Performance and Analysis

Details

Metrics

8 Record Views
Logo image