Logo image
Randomized Controlled Study of Cooled vs Room-Temperature Artificial Tears for Reducing Ocular Surface Irritation After Intravitreal Injection
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Randomized Controlled Study of Cooled vs Room-Temperature Artificial Tears for Reducing Ocular Surface Irritation After Intravitreal Injection

Smrithi Mani, Haoxing D. Jin, Bryce Shonka, Christopher R. Fortenbach and Jonathan F. Russell
Journal of VitreoRetinal Diseases, Vol.7(4), pp.310-315
07/2023
DOI: 10.1177/24741264231175555
PMCID: PMC10621712
PMID: 37927318
url
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10621712/pdf/10.1177_24741264231175555.pdfView
Open Access

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy of cooled vs room-temperature artificial tears in reducing ocular discomfort after intravitreal injections (IVIs). Methods: Patients receiving a standard intravitreal injection in the retina clinic who met the eligibility criteria and provided informed consented were enrolled in the study. Patients were randomized to the cooled tears or room-temperature tears intervention group. Both groups rated their ocular discomfort following IVI after cooled or room-temperature tears were administered. Results: The cooled group comprised 48 patients and the room-temperature group, 61 patients. There was no significant difference in the reduction of ocular discomfort between the cooled vs room-temperature artificial tears groups (P = .387). In addition, there was a similar level of reduction in ocular discomfort after either intervention (P = .681) regardless of whether or not the patients routinely used artificial tears after previous IVIs. Conclusions: Cooled tears provided no additional benefit in reducing ocular discomfort post-IVI compared with room-temperature tears. Baseline tear use after an IVI may have no true benefit other than a potential placebo effect, recall bias, or both.
randomized controlled study ocular discomfort intravitreal injection surface irritation cooled tears

Details

Metrics

Logo image