Logo image
Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks

Laura A Frey Law, Jennifer E Lee, Tara R McMullen and Ting Xia
Applied ergonomics, Vol.42(1), pp.9-15
12/2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.03.007
PMCID: PMC2929289
PMID: 20462566

View Online

Abstract

Ratings of perceived discomfort (0 to 10 scale) have been used to estimate relative maximum holding times (%MHT), particularly for static tasks. A linear 1:10% ratio has been described, where a rating of 5 corresponds to 50%MHT. It is unknown whether this linear ratio is valid for dynamic tasks. Additionally, whether pain or exertion are the primary predictors of discomfort is not clear. Thus, the goal of this study was to investigate both pain and exertion ratings during static (50% maximum; N=42) and dynamic (75% maximum; N=34) elbow flexion tasks until failure. Gender, self-reported physical activity, and peak torque were also assessed. Pain and exertion ratings reasonably matched the 1:10% ratio during the static task but not during the dynamic task. Exertion related more strongly to MHT than pain in both tasks. Neither gender nor activity level appeared to influence perceptual ratings, but peak torque explained approximately 20% of the variance in MHT.
Pain - classification Physical Exertion - physiology Humans Male Young Adult Exercise Test Pain - physiopathology Adult Female Surveys and Questionnaires Muscle Fatigue - physiology Task Performance and Analysis Isometric Contraction - physiology

Details

Metrics

Logo image