Logo image
Remote Neuropsychological Assessment in Rural American Indians with and without Cognitive Impairment
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Remote Neuropsychological Assessment in Rural American Indians with and without Cognitive Impairment

Hannah E. Wadsworth, Jeanine M. Galusha-Glasscock, Kyle B. Womack, Mary Quiceno, Myron F. Weiner, Linda S. Hynan, Jay Shore and C. Munro Cullum
Archives of clinical neuropsychology, Vol.31(5), pp.420-425
08/01/2016
DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw030
PMCID: PMC4954610
PMID: 27246957
url
https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acw030View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Objective: To determine the feasibility and reliability of a brief battery of standard neuropsychological tests administered via video teleconference (VTC) to a sample of rural American Indians compared with traditional face-to-face administration. Methods: The sample consisted of 84 participants from the Choctaw Nation in Oklahoma, including 53 females and 31 males [M age = 64.89 (SD = 9.73), M education = 12.58 (SD = 2.35)]. Of these, 29 had a diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment or dementia, and 55 were cognitively normal. Tests included the MMSE, Clock Drawing, Digit Span Forward and Backward, Oral Trails, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised, Letter and Category Fluency, and a short form Boston Naming Test. Alternative forms of tests were administered in counterbalanced fashion in both face-to-face and VTC conditions. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to compare test scores between test conditions across the entire sample. Results: All ICCs were significant (p < .0001) and ranged from 0.65 (Clock Drawing) to 0.93 (Boston Naming Test), with a mean ICC of 0.82. Conclusion: Results add to the expanding literature supporting the feasibility and reliability of remote videoconference-based neuropsychological test administration and extend findings to American Indians.
Psychology Psychology, Clinical Social Sciences

Details

Logo image