Journal article
Resources and rewards for clerkship directors: how surgery compares
The American journal of surgery, Vol.199(1), pp.66-71
01/2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.017
PMID: 20103068
Abstract
Clerkship directors (CDs) are key educators and active clinicians. In 2003, the Alliance for Clinical Education published standards for CD resources and responsibilities, but how reality compares is unknown.
Representatives from each core clinical disciplines' CD organizations created an electronic survey that CDs received in 2006-2007.
More than 500 CDs responded, including 71 surgeons. Surgeons reported spending approximately 27% of professional time on education. Most have codirectors, so total CD effort approximates the greater than 50% Alliance for Clinical Education guidelines. No disciplines' CDs have more than one support staff as recommended. Surgeons have the least clinic time, but the most inpatient weeks and many publications. Surgery CD concerns are curricula and simulation; few believe being a CD impairs academic advancement and more than 95% believe it enhances work satisfaction.
Surgery CDs are clinically active and academically productive. Although few surgery CDs have the recommended support staff, more than 95% report being a CD enhances work satisfaction.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Resources and rewards for clerkship directors: how surgery compares
- Creators
- Kimberly Ephgrave - Department of Surgery, University of Iowa, Carver College of Medicine, 200 Newton Rd., Iowa City, IA 52242-2600, USA. kimberly-ephgrave@uiowa.eduKristi FergusonAimen ShaabanHisakazu Hoshi
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- The American journal of surgery, Vol.199(1), pp.66-71
- Publisher
- United States
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.08.017
- PMID
- 20103068
- ISSN
- 0002-9610
- eISSN
- 1879-1883
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 01/2010
- Academic Unit
- Surgery; General Internal Medicine; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984051798602771
Metrics
23 Record Views