Journal article
Revisiting the evidence on thermostatic response to democratic change: degrees of democratic support or researcher degrees of freedom?
Political science research and methods, Vol.13(1), pp.237-243
01/2025
DOI: 10.1017/psrm.2024.16
Appears in UI Libraries Support Open Access
Abstract
Prominent recent work argues that support for democracy behaves thermostatically—that democratic erosion boosts democratic support while deepening democracy yields public backlash—and further contends that there is no evidence for the classic argument that democracy itself increases democratic support over time. Here, we document how these conclusions depend on subtle choices in measurement coding that constitute “researcher degrees of freedom”: analyses employing alternative reasonable choices provide little or no support for the original conclusions. The fragility of the statistical results demonstrates that researcher degrees of freedom in measurement must be taken seriously and that the question of the relationship between democratic institutions and democratic support remains unsettled.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Revisiting the evidence on thermostatic response to democratic change: degrees of democratic support or researcher degrees of freedom?
- Creators
- Yue Hu - Tsinghua UniversityYuehong Cassandra Tai - Pennsylvania State UniversityFrederick Solt - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Political science research and methods, Vol.13(1), pp.237-243
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press
- DOI
- 10.1017/psrm.2024.16
- ISSN
- 2049-8470
- eISSN
- 2049-8489
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 05/02/2024
- Date published
- 01/2025
- Academic Unit
- Political Science
- Record Identifier
- 9984627149102771
Metrics
8 Record Views