Logo image
Robust Markers and Sample Sizes for Multicenter Trials of Huntington Disease
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Robust Markers and Sample Sizes for Multicenter Trials of Huntington Disease

Peter A Wijeratne, Eileanoir B Johnson, Arman Eshaghi, Leon Aksman, Sarah Gregory, Hans J Johnson, Govinda R Poudel, Amrita Mohan, Cristina Sampaio, Nellie Georgiou-Karistianis, …
Annals of neurology, Vol.87(5), pp.751-762
05/2020
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25709
PMCID: PMC7187160
PMID: 32105364
url
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25709View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The identification of sensitive biomarkers is essential to validate therapeutics for Huntington disease (HD). We directly compare structural imaging markers across the largest collective imaging HD dataset to identify a set of imaging markers robust to multicenter variation and to derive upper estimates on sample sizes for clinical trials in HD. We used 1 postprocessing pipeline to retrospectively analyze T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans from 624 participants at 3 time points, from the PREDICT-HD, TRACK-HD, and IMAGE-HD studies. We used mixed effects models to adjust regional brain volumes for covariates, calculate effect sizes, and simulate possible treatment effects in disease-affected anatomical regions. We used our model to estimate the statistical power of possible treatment effects for anatomical regions and clinical markers. We identified a set of common anatomical regions that have similarly large standardized effect sizes (>0.5) between healthy control and premanifest HD (PreHD) groups. These included subcortical, white matter, and cortical regions and nonventricular cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). We also observed a consistent spatial distribution of effect size by region across the whole brain. We found that multicenter studies were necessary to capture treatment effect variance; for a 20% treatment effect, power of >80% was achieved for the caudate (n = 661), pallidum (n = 687), and nonventricular CSF (n = 939), and, crucially, these imaging markers provided greater power than standard clinical markers. Our findings provide the first cross-study validation of structural imaging markers in HD, supporting the use of these measurements as endpoints for both observational studies and clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:751-762.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Adult Clinical Trials as Topic Female Humans Huntington Disease - diagnostic imaging Huntington Disease - pathology Huntington Disease - therapy Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Male Middle Aged Multicenter Studies as Topic Neuroimaging - methods Observational Studies as Topic Retrospective Studies

Details

Metrics

Logo image