Sensitivity analysis of the USEPA WINS PM2.5 separator: PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler

Robert W Vanderpool; Thomas M Peters; Sanjay Natarajan; Michael P Tolocka; David B Gemmill; Russell W Wiener

doi:10.1080/02786820120868

Back

Sensitivity analysis of the USEPA WINS PM2.5 separator: PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Sensitivity analysis of the USEPA WINS PM2.5 separator: PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler

Robert W Vanderpool, Thomas M Peters, Sanjay Natarajan, Michael P Tolocka, David B Gemmill and Russell W Wiener

Aerosol science and technology, Vol.34(5), pp.465-476

2001

DOI: 10.1080/02786820120868

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1080/02786820120868View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Factors affecting the performance of the USEPA WINS PM2.5 separator have been systematically evaluated. In conjunction with the separator's laboratory calibrated penetration curve, analysis of the governing equation that describes conventional impactor performance was used to predict changes in cutpoint as a function of impactor dimensions, flow rate, uncertainties in ambient temperature and pressure measurement, and the temperature and pressure of the sampled air volume. By integrating the resulting performance curves with three idealized ambient aerosol size distributions, the effect of these parameters on measured PM2.5 concentration was predicted. Results showed that allowable variations in impactor jet width, flow rate, diffusion oil volumes, and ambient temperature and pressure measurement result in relatively minimal PM2.5 mass concentration measurement biases. Loading of the WINS well with previously collected particles slightly reduces the separator's cutpoint and thus slightly reduces expected PM2.5 mass concentrations. Variations in ambient pressure produce negligible changes in the performance of the WINS. While not causing a true measurement bias as defined by the regulations, low ambient temperatures naturally affect the airstream's properties and inherently shifts the WINS' cutpoint to slightly lower values. Laboratory-induced crystallization of the DOW 704 diffusion oil produced no appreciable changes in either the position or shape of the WINS separation curve.

Meteorology

Earth, ocean, space

Exact sciences and technology

External geophysics

Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models

Particles and aerosols

Details

Title: Subtitle: Sensitivity analysis of the USEPA WINS PM2.5 separator: PM2.5 Federal Reference Method Sampler
Creators: Robert W Vanderpool - Center for Engineering and Environmental Technology, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Thomas M Peters - Center for Engineering and Environmental Technology, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Sanjay Natarajan - Center for Engineering and Environmental Technology, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Michael P Tolocka - Atmospheric Methods and Monitoring Branch, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
David B Gemmill - Atmospheric Methods and Monitoring Branch, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Russell W Wiener - Atmospheric Methods and Monitoring Branch, National Exposure Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Aerosol science and technology, Vol.34(5), pp.465-476
DOI: 10.1080/02786820120868
ISSN: 0278-6826
eISSN: 1521-7388
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Language: English
Date published: 2001
Academic Unit: Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering; Occupational and Environmental Health
Record Identifier: 9984214697502771

Metrics

14 Record Views