Journal article
Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements
Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, Vol.16(8), pp.564-574
08/03/2019
DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2019.1628965
PMCID: PMC6954050
PMID: 31251121
Abstract
The quality of mass concentration estimates from increasingly popular networks of low-cost particulate matter sensors depends on accurate conversion of sensor output (e.g., voltage) into gravimetric-equivalent mass concentration, typically using a calibration procedure. This study evaluates two important sources of variability that lead to error in estimating gravimetric-equivalent mass concentration: the temporal changes in sensor calibration and the spatial and temporal variability in gravimetric correction factors. A 40-node sensor network was deployed in a heavy vehicle manufacturing facility for 8 months. At a central location in the facility, particulate matter was continuously measured with three sensors of the network and a traditional, higher-cost photometer, determining the calibration slope and intercept needed to translate sensor output to photometric-equivalent mass concentration. Throughout the facility, during three intensive sampling campaigns, respirable mass concentrations were measured with gravimetric samplers and photometers to determine correction factors needed to adjust photometric-equivalent to gravimetric-equivalent mass concentration. Both field-determined sensor calibration slopes and intercepts were statistically different than those estimated in the laboratory (α = 0.05), emphasizing the importance of aerosol properties when converting voltage to photometric-equivalent mass concentration and the need for field calibration to determine slope. Evidence suggested the sensors' weekly field calibration slope decreased and intercept increased, indicating the sensors were deteriorating over time. The mean correction factor in the cutting and shot blasting area (2.9) was substantially and statistically lower than that in the machining and welding area (4.6; p = 0.01). Therefore, different correction factors should be determined near different occupational processes to accurately estimate particle mass concentrations.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Sources of error and variability in particulate matter sensor network measurements
- Creators
- Christopher Zuidema - University of WashingtonLarissa V Stebounova - University of IowaSinan Sousan - University of North Carolina at Chapel HillGeb Thomas - University of IowaKirsten Koehler - Johns Hopkins UniversityThomas M Peters - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene, Vol.16(8), pp.564-574
- DOI
- 10.1080/15459624.2019.1628965
- PMID
- 31251121
- PMCID
- PMC6954050
- NLM abbreviation
- J Occup Environ Hyg
- ISSN
- 1545-9624
- eISSN
- 1545-9632
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Grant note
- T32ES015459 / University of Washington's Biostatistics, Epidemiology, and Bioinformatics Training in Environmental Heath (BEBTEH) R01 OH010533 / National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health T42 OH 008428 / NIOSH
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 08/03/2019
- Academic Unit
- Roy J. Carver Department of Biomedical Engineering; Occupational and Environmental Health; Orthopedics and Rehabilitation; Industrial and Systems Engineering
- Record Identifier
- 9984187062802771
Metrics
23 Record Views