Journal article
Specific Aptitude Theory Revisited: Is There Incremental Validity for Training Performance?
International journal of selection and assessment, Vol.14(2), pp.87-100
06/2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00336.x
Abstract
There has been controversy over the years about whether specific mental abilities increment validity for predicting performance above and beyond the validity for general mental ability (GMA). Despite its appeal, specific aptitude theory has received only sporadic empirical support. Using more exact statistical and measurement methods and a larger data set than previous studies, this study provides further evidence that specific aptitude theory is not tenable with regard to training performance. Across 10 jobs, differential weighting of specific aptitudes and specific aptitude tests were found not to improve the prediction of training performance over the validity of GMA. Implications of this finding for training research and practice are discussed. © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Specific Aptitude Theory Revisited: Is There Incremental Validity for Training Performance?
- Creators
- Kenneth G. Brown - University of Iowa kenneth-g-brown@uiowa.eduHuy Le - University of IowaFrank L Schmidt - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- International journal of selection and assessment, Vol.14(2), pp.87-100
- DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2389.2006.00336.x
- ISSN
- 0965-075X
- eISSN
- 1468-2389
- Publisher
- Blackwell Publishing Ltd
- Number of pages
- 14
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 06/2006
- Academic Unit
- Management and Entrepreneurship ; Educational Policy and Leadership Studies; Center for Social Science Innovation
- Record Identifier
- 9984371301802771
Metrics
15 Record Views