Logo image
Technical Note: A method for quality assurance of landmark sets for use in evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy of lung parenchyma
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Technical Note: A method for quality assurance of landmark sets for use in evaluation of deformable image registration accuracy of lung parenchyma

Christopher L Guy, Elisabeth Weiss, Nuzhat Jan, Gary E Christensen and Geoffrey D Hugo
Medical physics (Lancaster), Vol.46(2), pp.766-773
02/2019
DOI: 10.1002/mp.13336
PMCID: PMC6367034
PMID: 30537225
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6367034View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

To develop a quality control method to improve the accuracy of corresponding landmark sets used for deformable image registration (DIR) evaluation in the lung parenchyma. An iterative workflow was developed as a method for quality assurance of landmark sets. Starting with the initial landmark set for a given image pair, a landmark-based deformation was applied to one of the images. A difference image and a color overlay were generated using the deformed image and the other image of the pair. Inspection of these generated images at locations of landmarks allowed for the identification of misplaced landmarks. The observer responsible for creating the initial landmark set was tasked with review and revision of points flagged by the quality assurance procedure. Using the updated landmark sets, the process was repeated until all points were acceptable to the reviewer. Eighteen landmark sets, containing a mean (SD) of 170 (31) landmarks, were created using CT images from non-small cell lung cancer patients exhibiting large geometric changes and atelectasis resolution, making landmark specification challenging. Following the quality assurance procedure, the final landmark sets contained a mean (SD) of 165 (25) landmarks, as points too difficult to match were removed and points were added to regions deficient in landmarks. For landmark sets in which changes were made, maximum and mean differences in landmark positions before and after quality assurance ranged between 8.7-81.5 mm and 0.3-9.6 mm, respectively. An effective method for improving the accuracy of landmark correspondence was presented. This quality assurance approach enables more accurate evaluation of DIR for lung parenchyma in clinical image pairs in the absence of a ground truth deformation and may be applicable to other feature-rich anatomical sites.
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - diagnostic imaging Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung - pathology Feasibility Studies Humans Image Processing, Computer-Assisted - methods Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung - pathology Lung Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Lung Neoplasms - pathology Quality Control Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Details

Metrics

Logo image