Telemedicine in Nerve Surgery: An Effective Method to Determine Indications for Surgery

Noah S Llaneras; Ruby L Taylor; Jonah P M Orr; Rachel Alessio; Carolyn Carper; Brendan M Patterson; Susan E Mackinnon

doi:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006892

Back

Telemedicine in Nerve Surgery: An Effective Method to Determine Indications for Surgery

Journal article

Open access

Peer reviewed

Telemedicine in Nerve Surgery: An Effective Method to Determine Indications for Surgery

Noah S Llaneras, Ruby L Taylor, Jonah P M Orr, Rachel Alessio, Carolyn Carper, Brendan M Patterson and Susan E Mackinnon

Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, Vol.13(6), e6892

06/26/2025

DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006892

PMCID: PMC12200210

PMID: 40575609

Files and links (1)

url

https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006892View

Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic accelerated the adoption of telemedicine for surgical consultations. Although patient satisfaction has been well documented, limited research exists regarding telemedicine's effectiveness in determining the ability to indicate for surgical care compared with in-office visits. We conducted a retrospective review comparing surgical decision-making via telemedicine versus in-person consultations, hypothesizing that in-office visits would be more effective in establishing a surgical plan than telemedicine. A retrospective review of the medical records of all new patients presenting to the senior author's nerve surgery clinic at a high-volume quaternary referral center between June 2020 and January 2023 was performed. Surgical consultations were categorized as (1) surgery recommended, (2) surgery not recommended, (3) further screening required, or (4) surgery declined. The Fisher exact test compared the distribution of these categories between consultation types and the proportion of patients who underwent surgery after an initial recommendation. Of the 809 patients, 283 (35%) had in-person and 526 (65%) had telemedicine consultations. Surgery was recommended in 49.5% of in-person consultations compared with 38% of telemedicine consultations ( = 0.03). Among those recommended for surgery at the initial visit, 77.9% of in-person and 77.8% of telemedicine patients ultimately underwent surgery ( = 0.10). Of the telemedicine patients subsequently seen in the office and offered surgery, 84.5% ultimately underwent that surgery. Our findings suggest that telemedicine and in-office visits are equally effective in establishing a surgical plan, suggesting that the expansion of telemedicine could be considered for a broader geographic patient base.

Details

Title: Subtitle: Telemedicine in Nerve Surgery: An Effective Method to Determine Indications for Surgery
Creators: Noah S Llaneras - Washington University in St. Louis
Ruby L Taylor - From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Jonah P M Orr - From the Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
Rachel Alessio - Washington University in St. Louis
Carolyn Carper - Washington University in St. Louis
Brendan M Patterson - University of Iowa
Susan E Mackinnon - Washington University in St. Louis
Resource Type: Journal article
Publication Details: Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, Vol.13(6), e6892
DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006892
PMID: 40575609
PMCID: PMC12200210
NLM abbreviation: Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open
ISSN: 2169-7574
eISSN: 2169-7574
Publisher: LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
Grant note: Barnes-Jewish Foundation
The authors have no financial interest to declare in relation to the content of this article. Funding was provided by the Barnes-Jewish Foundation
Language: English
Date published: 06/26/2025
Academic Unit: Orthopedics and Rehabilitation
Record Identifier: 9984833631802771

Metrics

2 Record Views