Logo image
Temporal Trends in the Use of Therapeutic Hypothermia for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Temporal Trends in the Use of Therapeutic Hypothermia for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Steven M Bradley, Wenhui Liu, Bryan McNally, Kimberly Vellano, Timothy D Henry, Michael R Mooney, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis, Gary K Grunwald, Mehul Adhaduk, …
JAMA network open, Vol.1(7), pp.e184511-e184511
11/02/2018
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4511
PMCID: PMC6324404
PMID: 30646357
url
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.4511View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Despite evidence that therapeutic hypothermia improves patient outcomes for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, use of this therapy remains low. To determine whether the use of therapeutic hypothermia and patient outcomes have changed after publication of the Targeted Temperature Management trial on December 5, 2013, which supported more lenient temperature management for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A retrospective cohort was conducted between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016, of 45 935 US patients in the Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survived to hospital admission. Calendar time by quarter year. Use of therapeutic hypothermia and patient survival to hospital discharge. Among 45 935 patients (17 515 women and 28 420 men; mean [SD] age, 59.3 [18.3] years) who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survived to admission at 649 US hospitals, overall use of therapeutic hypothermia during the study period was 46.4%. In unadjusted analyses, the use of therapeutic hypothermia dropped from 52.5% in the last quarter of 2013 to 46.0% in the first quarter of 2014 after the December 2013 publication of the Targeted Temperature Management trial. Use of therapeutic hypothermia remained at or below 46.5% through 2016. In segmented hierarchical logistic regression analysis, the risk-adjusted odds of use of therapeutic hypothermia was 18% lower in the first quarter of 2014 compared with the last quarter of 2013 (odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71-0.94; P = .006). Similar point-estimate changes over time were observed in analyses stratified by presenting rhythm of ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation (odds ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.71-1.13, P = .35) and pulseless electrical activity or asystole (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89; P = .001). Overall risk-adjusted patient survival was 36.9% in 2013, 37.5% in 2014, 34.8% in 2015, and 34.3% in 2016 (P < .001 for trend). In mediation analysis, temporal trends in use of hypothermia did not consistently explain trends in patient survival. In a US registry of patients who experienced out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the use of guideline-recommended therapeutic hypothermia decreased after publication of the Targeted Temperature Management trial, which supported more lenient temperature thresholds. Concurrent with this change, survival among patients admitted to the hospital decreased, but was not mediated by use of hypothermia.
Adult Aged Female Guideline Adherence Heart Arrest Hospital Mortality Humans Hypothermia, Induced Logistic Models Male Middle Aged Odds Ratio Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - mortality Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest - therapy Patient Admission Practice Guidelines as Topic Practice Patterns, Physicians Pulse Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic Registries Retrospective Studies Tachycardia, Ventricular United States - epidemiology Ventricular Fibrillation

Details

Metrics

Logo image