Logo image
Back
Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Testing hemifield independence for divided attention in visual object tasks

Dina V. Popovkina, John Palmer, Cathleen M. Moore and Geoffrey M. Boynton
Journal of vision (Charlottesville, Va.), Vol.23(13), 3
11/03/2023
DOI: 10.1167/jov.23.13.3
PMCID: PMC10629520
PMID: 37922155
url
https://doi.org/10.1167/jov.23.13.3View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

In this study, we asked to what degree hemifields contribute to divided attention effects observed in tasks with object-based judgments. If object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully independent, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would eliminate divided attention effects; in the alternative extreme, if object recognition processes in the two hemifields were fully integrated, then placing stimuli in separate hemifields would not modulate divided attention effects. Using a dual-task paradigm, we compared performance in a semantic categorization task for relevant stimuli arranged in the same hemifield to performance for relevant stimuli arranged in separate left and right hemifields. In two experiments, there was a reliable decrease in divided attention effects when stimuli were shown in separate hemifields compared to the same hemifield. However, the effect of divided attention was not eliminated. These results reject both the independent and integrated hypotheses, and instead support a third alternative – that object recognition processes in the two hemifields are partially dependent. More specifically, the magnitude of modulation by hemifields was closer to the prediction of the integrated hypothesis, suggesting that for dual tasks with objects, dependent processing is mostly shared across the visual field.

Details

Metrics

3 Record Views
1 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image