Journal article
The Avoidance of Punishment: A Legal-Bureaucratic Model of Suspended Sentences in Federal White-Collar Cases Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
Social forces, Vol.78(1), pp.303-329
09/1999
DOI: 10.1093/sf/78.1.303
Abstract
This research proposes a legal-bureaucratic framework of sentencing in white-collar crime cases. This framework offers a model of sentencing that goes beyond the legal/extralegal debate by specifying how an interplay between legality and bureaucratic interests intervene in the relationship between defendant characteristics, case complexity, and sentence outcomes. In decisions to suspend punishment in federal district courts prior to the federal sentencing guidelines, findings from the structural model indicate the direct and indirect effects of pleading guilty and case complexity on the decision to suspend an incarceration sentence. In addition, the findings offer modest support for the hypothesis that defendant's location in the stratification system translates into advantage at sentencing via a structural link with case complexity and pleading guilty-the nexus of the legal-bureaucratic model.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The Avoidance of Punishment: A Legal-Bureaucratic Model of Suspended Sentences in Federal White-Collar Cases Prior to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
- Creators
- Celesta A Albonetti - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Social forces, Vol.78(1), pp.303-329
- Publisher
- The University of North Carolina Press
- DOI
- 10.1093/sf/78.1.303
- ISSN
- 0037-7732
- eISSN
- 1534-7605
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 09/1999
- Academic Unit
- Sociology and Criminology; Law Faculty
- Record Identifier
- 9984305978502771
Metrics
7 Record Views