Logo image
Back
The Genetic Relationship Between Alcohol Consumption and Aspects of Problem Drinking in an Ascertained Sample
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Genetic Relationship Between Alcohol Consumption and Aspects of Problem Drinking in an Ascertained Sample

Emma C Johnson, Celine L St. Pierre, Jacquelyn L Meyers, Fazil Aliev, Vivia V McCutcheon, Dongbing Lai, Danielle M Dick, Alison M Goate, John Kramer, Samuel Kuperman, …
Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research, Vol.43(6), pp.1113-1125
06/2019
DOI: 10.1111/acer.14064
PMCID: PMC6560626
PMID: 30994927
url
https://doi.org/10.1111/acer.14064View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Background Genomewide association studies (GWAS) have begun to identify loci related to alcohol consumption, but little is known about whether this genetic propensity overlaps with specific indices of problem drinking in ascertained samples. Methods In 6,731 European Americans who had been exposed to alcohol, we examined whether polygenic risk scores (PRS) from a GWAS of weekly alcohol consumption in the UK Biobank predicted variance in 6 alcohol‐related phenotypes: alcohol use, maximum drinks within 24 hours (MAXD), total score on the Self‐Rating of the Effects of Ethanol Questionnaire (SRE‐T), DSM‐IV alcohol dependence (DSM4AD), DSM‐5 alcohol use disorder symptom counts (DSM5AUDSX), and reduction/cessation of problematic drinking. We also examined the extent to which an single nucleotide polymorphism (rs1229984) in ADH1B, which is strongly associated with both alcohol consumption and dependence, contributed to the polygenic association with these phenotypes and whether PRS interacted with sex, age, or family history of alcoholism to predict alcohol‐related outcomes. We performed mixed‐effect regression analyses, with family membership and recruitment site included as random effects, as well as survival modeling of age of onset of DSM4AD. Results PRS for alcohol consumption significantly predicted variance in 5 of the 6 outcomes: alcohol use (Δmarginal R2 = 1.39%, Δ area under the curve [AUC] = 0.011), DSM4AD (Δmarginal R2 = 0.56%; ΔAUC = 0.003), DSM5AUDSX (Δmarginal R2 = 0.49%), MAXD (Δmarginal R2 = 0.31%), and SRE‐T (Δmarginal R2 = 0.22%). PRS were also associated with onset of DSM4AD (hazard ratio = 1.11, p = 2.08e−5). The inclusion of rs1229984 attenuated the effects of the alcohol consumption PRS, particularly for DSM4AD and DSM5AUDSX, but the PRS continued to exert an independent effect for all 5 alcohol measures (Δmarginal R2 after controlling for ADH1B = 0.14 to 1.22%). Interactions between PRS and sex, age, or family history were nonsignificant. Conclusions Genetic propensity for typical alcohol consumption was associated with alcohol use and was also associated with 4 of the additional 5 outcomes, though the variance explained in this sample was modest. Future GWAS that focus on the multifaceted nature of AUD, which goes beyond consumption, might reveal additional information regarding the polygenic underpinnings of problem drinking. The extent to which polygenic liability for alcohol consumption (i.e., drinks per week) overlaps with more severe drinking behaviors, such as maximum drinks consumed, is unclear. We examined the associations between a polygenic score for alcohol consumption measured in the UK Biobank, a population cohort, and several measures of regular and problematic alcohol use in an ascertained sample. Genetic propensity for consumption was associated with 5 of 6 outcomes, but the variance explained in this sample was modest.
 Alcohol Dependence Alcohol Consumption ADH1B Polygenic Risk

Details

Metrics

22 Record Views
16 Times Cited - Web of Science
Logo image