Journal article
The Impact of Visiting Rotations on the Urology Residency Match: Insights and Perspectives From the 2021-2022 Applicants
Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), Vol.170, pp.38-45
12/01/2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.040
PMID: 36462840
Abstract
To survey 2022 Urology Residency Match applicants on their away rotation experiences to better understand the impact of pandemic changes, including the one in-person away rotation limit, on interviews and match outcomes.
An anonymous post-match online survey was distributed to applicants of study-participating institutions. Data was prospectively collected regarding respondent demographics, away rotation experiences, interviews, utilization of preference signaling, and overall match outcomes.
In total, 230 applicants completed the survey. Respondents prioritized geography (28.1%), program reputation (26.1%), and early notification (25.6%) as the top factors in determining whether to accept a rotation offer. The majority (93%) participated in a single away rotation, with nearly all respondents being offered a virtual interview from the program where they completed a visiting clerkship. Of those who declined away rotation offers, 56% were not offered an interview at the program they declined an offer from. The majority matched at either their home institution (20.8%), a program where they submitted a preference signal (22.2%), or a program where they completed an in-person away rotation (13%). Despite 46.3% of respondents reporting that their match outcome was negatively affected by the ability to rotate at only one away rotation, the majority were satisfied (70%) with their rotation selection based on match results.
For applicants, participation in visiting rotations plays a significant role in the match process. Further research regarding mechanisms to optimize the away rotation application process is needed as the capacity to do visiting electives expands in the post-pandemic environment.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The Impact of Visiting Rotations on the Urology Residency Match: Insights and Perspectives From the 2021-2022 Applicants
- Creators
- Miyad Movassaghi - Columbia UniversityAnton Gillespie - Columbia UniversityChristopher M. Deibert - University of Nebraska Medical CenterMark Jordan - University of California, IrvineGary E. Lemack - The University of Texas Southwestern Medical CenterElizabeth Takacs - Department of Urology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IAGina M. Badalato - Columbia University
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.), Vol.170, pp.38-45
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.urology.2022.08.040
- PMID
- 36462840
- ISSN
- 0090-4295
- eISSN
- 1527-9995
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 12/01/2022
- Academic Unit
- Obstetrics and Gynecology; Urology
- Record Identifier
- 9984544623602771
Metrics
4 Record Views