Journal article
The Import of the Original Bradley’s Regress(es)
Axiomathes : quaderni del Centro studi per la filosofia mitteleuropea, Vol.24(3), pp.375-394
09/01/2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10516-014-9229-8
Abstract
Much of the recent metaphysical literature on the problem of the relational unity of complexes leaves the impression that Bradley (or some Bradleyan argument) has uncovered a serious problem to be addressed. The problem is thought to be particularly challenging for trope theorists and realists about universals. In truth, there has been little clarity about the nature and import of the original Bradley’s regress arguments. In this paper, I offer a careful analysis and reconstruction of the arguments in Bradley’s
Appearance and Reality
(
1893
). The analysis reveals that no less than three regress arguments against relations can be found. I show that none of them are compelling. I argue that, as a result, it is a serious misstep for philosophers today to offer metaphysical theses based on the unchallenged assumption that Bradley has established his regress result. I further analyze the underpinnings of the Bradley problem as it is frequently cast in contemporary literature and show that they rely on certain confusions and biases, which once brought to light, make current Bradley-inspired arguments against relations unconvincing.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The Import of the Original Bradley’s Regress(es)
- Creators
- Katarina Perovic - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Axiomathes : quaderni del Centro studi per la filosofia mitteleuropea, Vol.24(3), pp.375-394
- Publisher
- Springer Netherlands
- DOI
- 10.1007/s10516-014-9229-8
- ISSN
- 1122-1151
- eISSN
- 1572-8390
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 09/01/2014
- Academic Unit
- Philosophy
- Record Identifier
- 9984397191902771
Metrics
3 Record Views