Logo image
The Rare Disease Research Scholars Program: A training curriculum for clinical researchers with mixed methods evaluation study
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The Rare Disease Research Scholars Program: A training curriculum for clinical researchers with mixed methods evaluation study

Debra S Regier, Jennifer A Weaver, Nancy Cheng, Mark L Batshaw, Mary Ottolini, Michael E Shy and Marshall L Summar
Translational science of rare diseases, Vol.6(1-2), pp.1-11
12/17/2021
DOI: 10.3233/TRD-210051
PMCID: PMC9108859
PMID: 35601643
url
https://doi.org/10.3233/TRD-210051View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Rare disease clinician investigators are essential to ensure appropriate diagnosis, care, and treatment for the rapidly growing rare disease population. As these researchers are spread across many specialties, learning the unique skill set for rare disease research (RDR) can be a hurdle and may hinder progress in the field. The need for an RDR focused training program for investigators in many specialties and backgrounds was identified in a needs assessment of trainees in the NIH funded Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network. Based on this information, the Rare Disease Research Scholars Program (RDRSP) was developed. We describe the needs assessment, curriculum creation, scholar recruitment, and outcome evaluation based on four years of programmatic data (2015–2019). This one year-long RDRSP uses a blended approach that includes in-person, web-based, synchronous and asynchronous learning. We evaluated the RDRSP using quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative measures included pre and post questionnaires about knowledge, self-efficacy, and intent to remain in RDR. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and a paired t-test. Qualitative semi-structured interviews explored the RDR scholars’ perceptions of the RDRSP; thematic analysis examined the textual data. Quantitative pre- and post-measures were statistically significant in the following areas: 1) improved knowledge content in RDR, 2) enhanced self-efficacy in clinical research, and 3) intent to remain in the field of RDR. Qualitative data analysis found the program supported the development of the scholar’s research skills as well as ‘soft-skills’. By combining training of skills unique to RDR with the more general topics of leadership, mentorship and collaboration among participants in diverse specialties, we created a program that supports the development of the next generation of rare disease clinician investigators and serves as a model for training in other niche research areas.

Details

Metrics

27 Record Views
Logo image