Journal article
The SEC’s September Spike: Regulatory Inconsistency within the Fiscal Year
Journal of accounting & economics, Vol.77(2-3), 101636
04/2024
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101636
Abstract
We examine whether performance reporting leads to inconsistent enforcement at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). In a sample of over 13,000 SEC enforcement actions, we show that SEC staff respond to performance-reporting pressures and file more enforcement actions in September, the final month of the SEC's fiscal year, than in any other month. The increase in case volume in September is not fully explained by staff filing more procedural cases or accelerating case filings. Instead, SEC staff pursue less complex cases and agree to more lenient financial and non-financial sanctions to increase case volume in September. We attempt to rule out alternative explanations for our results, including natural SEC workflow and resource constraints. Overall, our findings suggest that performance reporting creates agency conflicts that lead to regulatory inconsistency within the fiscal year.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The SEC’s September Spike: Regulatory Inconsistency within the Fiscal Year
- Creators
- Dain C. Donelson - University of IowaMatthew Kubic - The University of Texas at AustinSara Toynbee - The University of Texas at Austin
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Journal of accounting & economics, Vol.77(2-3), 101636
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.jacceco.2023.101636
- ISSN
- 0165-4101
- eISSN
- 1879-1980
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 08/2023
- Date published
- 04/2024
- Academic Unit
- Accounting; Law Faculty
- Record Identifier
- 9984455610902771
Metrics
18 Record Views