Journal article
The Utility of Outcome Monitoring in Determining Competence: A Rejoinder
Professional psychology, research and practice, Vol.52(2), pp.190-194
04/01/2021
DOI: 10.1037/pro0000336
Abstract
In this rejoinder, the authors address several issues raised by Commentary (Blinded) regarding (a) the definition and determination of professional competence, (b) the utility of ROM and multicultural competence, and (c) the interpretation and application of ROM data in determining clinical effectiveness and competence. The authors challenge the longstanding notion that boundaries of competence should be determined based on therapists' previous training and clinical experience and echo previous calls for competence and clinical effectiveness in professional psychology to encompass ROM data. Additionally, we echo several important limitations and clinical considerations offered by Commentary (Blinded) for the utility of ROM data in determining boundaries of competence.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The Utility of Outcome Monitoring in Determining Competence: A Rejoinder
- Creators
- D. Martin Kivlighan - Univ Iowa, Dept Psychol & Quantitat Fdn, N334 Lindquist Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52240 USADennis H. Pinner - University of IowaCara L. Solness - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Professional psychology, research and practice, Vol.52(2), pp.190-194
- Publisher
- Amer Psychological Assoc
- DOI
- 10.1037/pro0000336
- ISSN
- 0735-7028
- eISSN
- 1939-1323
- Number of pages
- 5
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 04/01/2021
- Academic Unit
- Psychiatry; Psychological and Quantitative Foundations; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984360155202771
Metrics
30 Record Views