Journal article
The desirability bias in predictions: Going optimistic without leaving realism
Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol.111(1), pp.33-47
2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.08.003
Abstract
Does desire for an outcome inflate optimism? Previous experiments have produced mixed results regarding the
desirability bias, with the bulk of supportive findings coming from one paradigm—the classic
marked-card paradigm in which people make discrete predictions about desirable or undesirable cards being drawn from decks. We introduce a biased-guessing account for the effects from this paradigm, which posits that people are often realistic in their likelihood assessments, but when making a subjectively arbitrary prediction (a guess), they will tend to guess in a desired direction. In order to establish the validity of the biased-guessing account and to distinguish it from other accounts, we conducted five experiments that tested the desirability bias within the paradigm and novel extensions of it. In addition to supporting the biased-guessing account, the findings illustrate the critical role of moderators (e.g., type of outcome, type of forecast) for fully understanding and predicting desirability biases.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The desirability bias in predictions: Going optimistic without leaving realism
- Creators
- Paul D Windschitl - Department of Psychology, E11 SSH, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United StatesAndrew R Smith - Department of Psychology, E11 SSH, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United StatesJason P Rose - Department of Psychology, University Hall 6516, University of Toledo, Toledo, OH, 43606, United StatesZlatan Krizan - Department of Psychology, W112 Lagomarcino Hall, Iowa State University, Ames, IA, 50011, United States
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Organizational behavior and human decision processes, Vol.111(1), pp.33-47
- Publisher
- Elsevier Inc
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.08.003
- ISSN
- 0749-5978
- eISSN
- 1095-9920
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 2010
- Academic Unit
- Psychological and Brain Sciences
- Record Identifier
- 9984214743802771
Metrics
8 Record Views