Journal article
The enduring effects of psychodynamic treatments vis-à-vis alternative treatments: A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis
Clinical psychology review, Vol.40, pp.1-14
08/2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.003
PMID: 26042927
Abstract
Although evidence suggests that the benefits of psychodynamic treatments are sustained over time, presently it is unclear whether these sustained benefits are superior to non-psychodynamic treatments. Additionally, the extant literature comparing the sustained benefits of psychodynamic treatments compared to alternative treatments is limited with methodological shortcomings. The purpose of the current study was to conduct a rigorous test of the growth of the benefits of psychodynamic treatments relative to alternative treatments across distinct domains of change (i.e., all outcome measures, targeted outcome measures, non-targeted outcome measures, and personality outcome measures). To do so, the study employed strict inclusion criteria to identify randomized clinical trials that directly compared at least one bona fide psychodynamic treatment and one bona fide non-psychodynamic treatment. Hierarchical linear modeling (Raudenbush, Bryk, Cheong, Congdon, & du Toit, 2011) was used to longitudinally model the impact of psychodynamic treatments compared to non-psychodynamic treatments at post-treatment and to compare the growth (i.e., slope) of effects beyond treatment completion. Findings from the present meta-analysis indicated that psychodynamic treatments and non-psychodynamic treatments were equally efficacious at post-treatment and at follow-up for combined outcomes (k=20), targeted outcomes (k=19), non-targeted outcomes (k=17), and personality outcomes (k=6). Clinical implications, directions for future research, and limitations are discussed.
•Examined the enduring impact of dynamic treatments versus non-dynamic treatments.•Calculated four ESs; targeted, non-targeted, personality, and combined measures.•Treatments were not significantly different at post-treatment for all four ESs.•Post-treatment slopes for all four ESs were non-significant.•Dynamic and non-dynamic treatments were equivalent at post-treatment and beyond.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The enduring effects of psychodynamic treatments vis-à-vis alternative treatments: A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis
- Creators
- D. Martin Kivlighan - University of Wisconsin–MadisonSimon B. Goldberg - University of Wisconsin–MadisonMaleeha Abbas - University of Wisconsin–MadisonBrian T. Pace - University of UtahNoah E. Yulish - University of Wisconsin–MadisonJoel G. Thomas - Universtiy of Illinois, United StatesMegan M. Cullen - University of Wisconsin–MadisonChristoph Flückiger - University of ZurichBruce E. Wampold - University of Wisconsin–Madison
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Clinical psychology review, Vol.40, pp.1-14
- Publisher
- Elsevier Ltd
- DOI
- 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.003
- PMID
- 26042927
- ISSN
- 0272-7358
- eISSN
- 1873-7811
- Grant note
- name: Society of Psychotherapy Research (SPR), award: 133-PRJ74RA
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 08/2015
- Academic Unit
- Psychiatry; Psychological and Quantitative Foundations; Internal Medicine
- Record Identifier
- 9984359581302771
Metrics
19 Record Views