Journal article
The gene normalization task in BioCreative III
BMC bioinformatics, Vol.12(Suppl 8), pp.S2-S2
10/03/2011
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S2
PMCID: PMC3269937
PMID: 22151901
Abstract
Background: We report the Gene Normalization (GN) challenge in BioCreative III where participating teams were asked to return a ranked list of identifiers of the genes detected in full-text articles. For training, 32 fully and 500 partially annotated articles were prepared. A total of 507 articles were selected as the test set. Due to the high annotation cost, it was not feasible to obtain gold-standard human annotations for all test articles. Instead, we developed an Expectation Maximization (EM) algorithm approach for choosing a small number of test articles for manual annotation that were most capable of differentiating team performance. Moreover, the same algorithm was subsequently used for inferring ground truth based solely on team submissions. We report team performance on both gold standard and inferred ground truth using a newly proposed metric called Threshold Average Precision (TAP-k). Results: We received a total of 37 runs from 14 different teams for the task. When evaluated using the gold-standard annotations of the 50 articles, the highest TAP-k scores were 0.3297 (k=5), 0.3538 (k=10), and 0.3535 (k=20), respectively. Higher TAP-k scores of 0.4916 (k=5, 10, 20) were observed when evaluated using the inferred ground truth over the full test set. When combining team results using machine learning, the best composite system achieved TAP-k scores of 0.3707 (k=5), 0.4311 (k=10), and 0.4477 (k=20) on the gold standard, representing improvements of 12.4%, 21.8%, and 26.6% over the best team results, respectively. Conclusions: By using full text and being species non-specific, the GN task in BioCreative III has moved closer to a real literature curation task than similar tasks in the past and presents additional challenges for the text mining community, as revealed in the overall team results. By evaluating teams using the gold standard, we show that the EM algorithm allows team submissions to be differentiated while keeping the manual annotation effort feasible. Using the inferred ground truth we show measures of comparative performance between teams. Finally, by comparing team rankings on gold standard vs. inferred ground truth, we further demonstrate that the inferred ground truth is as effective as the gold standard for detecting good team performance.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The gene normalization task in BioCreative III
- Creators
- Zhiyong Lu - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAHung-Yu Kao - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAChih-Hsuan Wei - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAMinlie Huang - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAJingchen Liu - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USACheng-Ju Kuo - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAChun-Nan Hsu - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USARichard Tzong-Han Tsai - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAHong-Jie Dai - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USANaoaki Okazaki - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAHan-Cheol Cho - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAMartin Gerner - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAIlles Solt - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAShashank Agarwal - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAFeifan Liu - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USADina Vishnyakova - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAPatrick Ruch - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAMartin Romacker - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAFabio Rinaldi - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USASanmitra Bhattacharya - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAPadmini Srinivasan - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAHongfang Liu - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAManabu Torii - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USASergio Matos - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USADavid Campos - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAKarin Verspoor - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAKevin M Livingston - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USAW John Wilbur - Center for Computational Pharmacology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- BMC bioinformatics, Vol.12(Suppl 8), pp.S2-S2
- DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S2
- PMID
- 22151901
- PMCID
- PMC3269937
- NLM abbreviation
- BMC Bioinformatics
- ISSN
- 1471-2105
- eISSN
- 1471-2105
- Publisher
- BioMed Central
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 10/03/2011
- Academic Unit
- Nursing; Computer Science; Business Analytics
- Record Identifier
- 9984003183502771
Metrics
34 Record Views