Logo image
The impact of Title IX iterations on campus sexual misconduct reports per synthetic control in the United States
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The impact of Title IX iterations on campus sexual misconduct reports per synthetic control in the United States

Hannah Rochford, Corinne Peek-Asa, Whitney Zahnd, Keith Mueller and Brian Kaskie
Journal of public health policy, Vol.47(1), pp.40-59
03/2026
DOI: 10.1057/s41271-025-00611-8
PMCID: PMC13008768
PMID: 41326631
url
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41271-025-00611-8View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Title IX regulation changes' impact on sexual misconduct (SM) reporting to the institutions of higher education (IHE) in the United States (US) remain poorly understood. To examine trends in the rates of SM reports submitted to each American institution's Title IX Office, we applied a synthetic control. US IHE members of the American Association of Universities comprised the 'treated' group, and Canadian IHE members of the Major Regional Associations were used to create a counterfactual proxy. Marginally significant increases (P = 0.08) in reports followed the 2017 Title IX guidance change (+ 1.18, + 4.51 and + 2.24 reports per 1000 enrolled students in 2017-2018, 2018-2019 and 2019-2020, respectively), and a marginally significant decrease (- 5.23 reports per 1000 enrolled students in 2020-2021) in SM reports to Title IX offices followed the 2020 Title IX iterations. Reporting and response structures, like those specified in Title IX iterations, may influence rates of SM reporting.
Sexual Harassment Sexual misconduct Campus violence Sexual violence Title IX Sexual assault

Details

Metrics

12 Record Views
Logo image