Logo image
The role of tropomyosin isoforms and phosphorylation in force generation in thin-filament reconstituted bovine cardiac muscle fibres
Journal article   Peer reviewed

The role of tropomyosin isoforms and phosphorylation in force generation in thin-filament reconstituted bovine cardiac muscle fibres

Xiaoying Lu, David H. Heeley, Lawrence B. Smillie and Masataka Kawai
Journal of muscle research and cell motility, Vol.31(2), pp.93-109
08/01/2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10974-010-9213-x
PMCID: PMC3089900
PMID: 20559861
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3089900View
Open Access

Abstract

The thin filament extraction and reconstitution protocol was used to investigate the functional roles of tropomyosin (Tm) isoforms and phosphorylation in bovine myocardium. The thin filament was extracted by gelsolin, reconstituted with G-actin, and further reconstituted with cardiac troponin together with one of three Tm varieties: phosphorylated alpha Tm (alpha Tm.P), dephosphorylated alpha Tm (alpha Tm.deP), and dephosphorylated beta Tm (beta Tm.deP). The effects of Ca, phosphate, MgATP and MgADP concentrations were examined in the reconstituted fibres at pH 7.0 and 25A degrees C. Our data show that Ca2+ sensitivity (pCa(50): half saturation point) was increased by 0.19 +/- A 0.07 units when beta Tm.deP was used instead of alpha Tm.deP (P < 0.05), and by 0.27 +/- A 0.06 units when phosphorylated alpha Tm was used (P < 0.005). The cooperativity (Hill factor) decreased (but insignificantly) from 3.2 +/- A 0.3 (5) to 2.8 +/- A 0.2 (7) with phosphorylation. The cooperativity decreased significantly from 3.2 +/- A 0.3 (5) to 2.1 +/- A 0.2 (9) with isoform change from alpha Tm.deP to beta Tm.deP. There was no significant difference in isometric tension or stiffness between alpha Tm.P, alpha Tm.deP, and beta Tm.deP muscle fibres at saturating [Ca2+] or after rigor induction. Based on the six-state cross-bridge model, sinusoidal analysis indicated that the equilibrium constants of elementary steps differed up to 1.7x between alpha Tm.deP and beta Tm.deP, and up to 2.0x between alpha Tm.deP and alpha Tm.P. The rate constants differed up to 1.5x between alpha Tm.deP and beta Tm.deP, and up to 2.4x between alpha Tm.deP and alpha Tm.P. We conclude that tension and stiffness per cross-bridge are not significantly different among the three muscle models.
Cell Biology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology

Details

Metrics

Logo image