Logo image
The routine use of nasopharyngeal airway in the setting of monitored anesthesia care during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multi-center single blinded randomized controlled trial
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

The routine use of nasopharyngeal airway in the setting of monitored anesthesia care during gastrointestinal endoscopy: A multi-center single blinded randomized controlled trial

Christian Raphael, Nancy Abou Nafeh, Marc Moukarzel, Thuraya HajAli, Eliane Alhalabi, Aliyya Dabbous, Raji Naamani, Patrick Maroun, Yasser Sheib, Marie T Aouad, …
PloS one, Vol.21(6), e0349946
06/03/2026
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0349946
PMCID: PMC13232847
PMID: 42234627
url
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0349946View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Monitored anesthesia care (MAC) is commonly used for gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, allowing patients to breathe spontaneously while sedated. Despite its benefits, MAC is associated with respiratory adverse events, such as desaturation or the need for interventions. Limited studies have examined the effectiveness of nasopharyngeal airways (NPA) in reducing airway maneuvers and improving respiratory stability during MAC. The study evaluates the efficacy and safety of NPA in reducing the occurrence of at least one airway intervention/desaturation in patients undergoing GI endoscopy under MAC. This multi-center, single-blinded randomized controlled trial involved patients undergoing GI endoscopy under MAC. A total of 329 patients were randomly assigned to either the NPA or control group. Primary outcomes included a composite primary outcome: occurrence of at least one airway intervention/desaturation. Secondary outcomes included adverse events, satisfaction scores of patients and healthcare providers, and the joint effects of NPA use and OSA risk on the occurrence of at least one airway intervention or desaturation. The NPA group showed significantly lower incidence of occurrence of at least one airway intervention/desaturation compared to controls (18.5% vs. 40.1%, P < 0.001). NPA significantly reduced the occurrence of at least one airway intervention/desaturation in both low and intermediate/high risk OSA groups. The reduction was stronger in low OSA risk group (OR=0.23, 95%CI [0.11-0.49]) versus intermediate/high OSA risk group (OR=0.45, 95%CI [0.21-0.95]. Health care provider satisfaction was significantly higher in the NPA group (p < 0.001). Mild, self-resolving epistaxis occurred in 3.1% of NPA patients. NPA use reduces airway interventions and enhances satisfaction among anesthesiologists and gastroenterologists during GI endoscopy under MAC. Routine utilization of NPAs in this context may be considered.
Adult Aged Airway Management - methods Anesthesia - methods Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal - methods Female Humans Male Middle Aged Nasopharynx Single-Blind Method

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image