Journal article
The theory of liberal dependency care: a reply to my critics
Critical review of international social and political philosophy, Vol.25(6), pp.843-857
05/04/2021
DOI: 10.1080/13698230.2021.1922865
Abstract
This author's reply addresses critiques by Daniel Engster, Kelly Gawel, and Andrea Westlund about my 2020 book, Freedom to Care: Liberalism, Dependency Care, and Culture. I begin with a statement of my commitment to liberalism. In section two, I defend the value of a distinction between conceptions of persons in the real world and in contract theory to track inequalities in care when indexed to legitimate needs. I argue, as well, that my variety of contract theory supplies the normative content needed to reject the subordination of women of color. Acknowledging the enduring danger of expressive subordination, I emphasize my theory's compatibility with the full social inclusion of people with disabilities. Section three then defends liberal dependency care's compatibility with radical critique and transformative change by emphasizing the abstract nature of its core theoretical module. Finally, in section four, I reaffirm conceptual distinctions between autonomy skills, care skills, and a sense of justice by explicating their theoretical roles. In that section, I also embrace Westlund's insight that theorists of justice need to have skills enabling responsiveness to other perspectives. To this new requirement for actual theorists of justice, I further add that we must attain capacities to engage critically with our society's norms. Thus, the final section of this article supplements the justificatory module of liberal dependency care, building from the necessary conditions specified as two-level contract theory toward an account of necessary and sufficient conditions for this liberalism's justificatory module.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- The theory of liberal dependency care: a reply to my critics
- Creators
- Asha Bhandary - University of Iowa
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Critical review of international social and political philosophy, Vol.25(6), pp.843-857
- DOI
- 10.1080/13698230.2021.1922865
- ISSN
- 1369-8230
- eISSN
- 1743-8772
- Publisher
- Routledge
- Language
- English
- Electronic publication date
- 05/04/2021
- Academic Unit
- Philosophy
- Record Identifier
- 9984083933202771
Metrics
72 Record Views