Journal article
Tourniquet Application for Bleeding Control in a Rural Trauma System: Outcomes and Implications for Prehospital Providers
Prehospital emergency care, Vol.26(2), pp.246-254
03/04/2022
DOI: 10.1080/10903127.2020.1868635
PMID: 33400604
Abstract
Introduction: Uncontrolled bleeding is a preventable cause of death in rural trauma. Herein, we examined the appropriateness, effectiveness, and safety of tourniquet application for bleeding control in a rural trauma system.
Methods: Medical records of adult patients admitted to our academic Level I trauma center between July 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographics (age, gender), injury (Injury severity score, Glascow Coma scale, mechanism of injury), tourniquet (type, tourniquet application site, tourniquet duration, place of application and removal, indication), and outcome data (complications such as amputation, acute kidney injury, rhabdomyolysis, or nerve palsy and mortality) were collected. Tourniquet indications, effectiveness, and complications were evaluated. Data were compared to those in urban settings.
Results: Ninety-two patients (94 tourniquets) were identified, of which 58.7% incurred penetrating injuries. Eighty-seven tourniquets (92.5%) were applied in the prehospital setting. Twenty tourniquets (21.3%) were applied to patients without an appropriate indication. Two of these tourniquets were applied in a hospital setting, while 18 occurred in the prehospital setting (p = 0.638). Patients with a non-indicated tourniquet presented with a higher hemoglobin level on admission, received less packed red blood cell units within the first 24 hours of hospitalization, and were less likely to require surgery for hemostasis. None of the non-indicated tourniquets led to a complication. Indicated tourniquets were deemed ineffective in seven cases (9.5%); they were all applied in the prehospital setting. The average tourniquet time was 123 min in rural vs. 48 min in urban settings, p < 0.001. There was no significant difference in mortality, amputation rates and incidence of nerve palsy between the rural and urban settings.
Conclusion: Even with long transport times, early tourniquet application for hemorrhage control in rural settings is safe with no significant attributable morbidity and mortality compared to published studies on urban civilian tourniquet use. The observed rates of non-indicated and ineffective tourniquets indicate suboptimal tourniquet usage and application. Opportunity exists for standardized hemorrhage control training on the use of direct pressure and pressure dressings, indications for tourniquet use, and effective tourniquet application.
Details
- Title: Subtitle
- Tourniquet Application for Bleeding Control in a Rural Trauma System: Outcomes and Implications for Prehospital Providers
- Creators
- Hala Bedri - Univ Iowa, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USAHadeal Ayoub - University of IowaJacklyn M. Engelbart - University of IowaMichele Lilienthal - University of IowaColette Galet - University of IowaDionne A. Skeete - Univ Iowa, Dept Surg, Div Acute Care Surg, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
- Resource Type
- Journal article
- Publication Details
- Prehospital emergency care, Vol.26(2), pp.246-254
- DOI
- 10.1080/10903127.2020.1868635
- PMID
- 33400604
- NLM abbreviation
- Prehosp Emerg Care
- ISSN
- 1090-3127
- eISSN
- 1545-0066
- Publisher
- Taylor & Francis
- Number of pages
- 9
- Language
- English
- Date published
- 03/04/2022
- Academic Unit
- Surgery; Injury Prevention Research Center
- Record Identifier
- 9984322797402771
Metrics
13 Record Views