Logo image
Back
Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model
Journal article   Open access   Peer reviewed

Transitioning Virtual-Only Group Therapy for Substance Use Disorder Patients to a Hybrid Model

Tyler S. Oesterle, Nicholas L. Bormann, Domenic A. Ochal, Stephan Arndt and Scott A. Breitinger
Substance abuse and rehabilitation, Vol.15, pp.73-78
01/01/2024
DOI: 10.2147/SAR.S460024
PMID: 38681859
url
https://doi.org/10.2147/SAR.S460024View
Published (Version of record) Open Access

Abstract

Purpose: Telehealth is associated with a myriad of benefits; however, little is known regarding substance use disorder (SUD) treatment outcomes when participants join group therapy sessions in a combination in-person and virtual setting (hybrid model). We sought to determine if treatment completion rates differed. Patients and Methods: Policy changes caused by the COVID-19 pandemic created a naturalistic, observational cohort study at seven intensive outpatient (IOP) programs in rural Minnesota. Virtual-only delivery occurred 6/1/2020-6/30/2021, while hybrid groups occurred 7/1/2021-7/31/2022. Data was evaluated retrospectively for participants who initiated and discharged treatment during the study period. Participants were IOP group members 18 years and older who had a SUD diagnosis that both entered and discharged treatment during the 26-month period. A consecutive sample of 1502 participants (181-255 per site) was available, with 644 removed: 576 discharged after the study conclusion, 49 were missing either enrollment or discharge data, 14 transferred sites during treatment, and 5 initiated treatment before the study initiation. Helmert contrasts evaluated the impact of hybrid group exposure. Results: A total of 858 individuals were included. Data was not from the medical chart and was deidentified preventing specific demographics; however, the overall IOP sample for 2020-2022, from which the sample was derived, was 29.8% female, and 64.1% were 18-40 years of age. For completed treatment, hybrid group exposure relative to virtual-only had a univariate odds ratio of 1.88 (95% CI: 1.50-2.41, p < 0.001). No significant difference was seen across IOP sites. Conclusion: These results describe a novel hybrid group approach to virtual care for SUDs with outcome data not previously documented in the literature. While virtual treatment delivery can increase access, these results suggest a benefit is derived from including an in-person option. Further research is needed to identify how an in-person component may change dynamics and if it can be replicated in virtual-only models.
 Substance Abuse Life Sciences & Biomedicine Science & Technology

Details

Metrics

1 Record Views
Logo image