Logo image
Trustworthiness and negative affect predict economic decision making
Journal article   Peer reviewed

Trustworthiness and negative affect predict economic decision making

Christopher M Nguyen, Michael Koenigs, Torricia H Yamada, Shu Hao Teo, Joseph E Cavanaugh, Daniel Tranel and Natalie L Denburg
Journal of Cognitive Psychology: Cognition and emotion: Neuroscience and behavioural perspectives, Vol.23(6), pp.748-759
09/01/2011
DOI: 10.1080/20445911.2011.575773
PMCID: PMC3594810
PMID: 23493494
url
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3594810View
Open Access

Abstract

The Ultimatum Game (UG) is a widely used and well-studied laboratory model of economic decision making. Here, we studied 129 healthy adults and compared demographic (i.e., age, gender, education), cognitive (i.e., intelligence, attention/working memory, speed, language, visuospatial, memory, executive functions), and personality (i.e., "Big Five", positive affect, negative affect) variables between those with a "rational" versus an "irrational" response pattern on the UG. Our data indicated that participants with "rational" UG performance (accepting any offer, no matter the fairness) endorsed higher levels of trust, or the belief in the sincerity and good intentions of others, whereas participants with "irrational" UG performance (rejecting unfair offers) endorsed higher levels of negative affect, such as anger and contempt. These personality variables were the only ones that differentiated the two response patterns-demographic and cognitive factors did not differ between rational and irrational players. The results indicate that the examination of personality and affect is crucial to our understanding of the individual differences that underlie decision making.
Trustworthiness Decision making Ultimatum Game Negative affect

Details

Metrics

Logo image